On 05.11.2014 11:28, Nick Burch wrote: > > Hmm, it's still failing on my machine, which both means I can't build the > 3.11 beta 3 release candidate, and that other users out there might hit the > problem too :( At this point, I'd probably be happy if the code just detected > it and threw a "your JVM is just too broken" exception which the test warned > about but didn't fail with >
I've added another workaround and a catch - hopefully it runs through now ... Andi. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
