On 16/10/15 21:52, Andreas Beeker wrote: > Hi, > >> Nick proposed we should have an ooxml-schemas-1.2 JAR containing visio, >> security & main, rather than three separate artefacts. But keep the >> existing lightweight one too. All agreed this made sense. ACTION: >> Someone to implement this. > As this seems to be shortly before done - and the security schema is kind of > my "fault". > Do we really need to increase the size of the full schema? > > Or to formulate it even more cynical, if users don't read the faq or > component docs - > they won't find the missing classes neither in the full schemas nor in the > tripple. > > I personally prefer to have more smaller jars instead of a big one. > Ideally every format has its own xml-jar. > And to look a bit more into the future, I think the jaxb variant might be > also smaller than xmlbeans - > so speculating, small enough to include everything for the corresponding > format. > > How about adding a profile (with description) to the maven poms - so a user > can > switch between the lite/full/triple dependency version?
Dustin, any thoughts? I have some work time allocated to POI next week and am keen to do what I can to progress us towards 3.14 beta1 Thanks, David -- David North, Technical Lead, CoreFiling Limited http://www.corefiling.com Phone: +44-1865-203192 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
