58787 is not ready for beta 1. I assumed that since the release tag has already been created for beta 1 that trunk is open for beta 2 commits.
If trunk is not open or we need to create a beta 1 RC 2, some svn merging will be needed to exclude these post-beta1 commits. On Apr 5, 2016 4:05 PM, "Andreas Beeker" <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi All, > > There are already checkins for beta2 ... how about postponing this > justification to beta2? > > I had a discussion with Dominik about what to include in the beta1 and > if I should wait for #58787 to be finished. > As we had some extensive testing for the trunk and #58787 seems to be a > bit elaborate, > I would like to also postpone it to beta2. > > Is this ok for you? > > Andi > > On 05.04.2016 08:47, Javen O'Neal wrote: > > Also, do we need to add bouncy castle, jaxb, or any other 3rd party libs > to > > our LICENSE or NOTICE file? > > > > https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/poi/trunk/legal/NOTICE?view=markup > > On Apr 4, 2016 11:44 PM, "Javen O'Neal" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Looks like our LICENSE [1] file still references ooxml-schemas-1.1, when > >> we're currently on 1.3 [2]. Are any other changes needed besides > >> incrementing the number? > >> > >> [1] https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/poi/trunk/legal/LICENSE?view=log > >> [2] > >> > https://builds.apache.org/job/POI/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/ooxml-lib/ > >> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
