> switch (cell.getCellType()) {
> case Cell.CELL_TYPE_NUMERIC:
I have fixed the backwards compatibility problem in r1757235. See [1]
for more info.
My vote is -1. We should rebuild the RC with r1757235.
I have added this test [2] to prove that the old way of working with
cell types works without modification alongside the new way.
[1] https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59791#c10
[2]
https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/poi/trunk/src/testcases/org/apache/poi/ss/usermodel/BaseTestCell.java?r1=1757235&r2=1757234&pathrev=1757235
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 8:30 AM, Dominik Stadler <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Oh, sorry for the false alarm, this seems to be a problem with my
> compare-tool (Beyond Compare), it displays two test-documents as being
> contained on top-level of the src-tar.gz. When extracting via other tools I
> don't see those.
>
> So I am +1 here!
>
> However I saw that we do actually break some stuff with all the
> Enum-rework, e.g. the following will not work any more out of the box:
>
> switch (cell.getCellType()) {
> case Cell.CELL_TYPE_NUMERIC:
>
> Unfortunately a switch on teh CellType is quite common, so we need to
> explain this in the release notes and I think we should be a bit more
> conservative with all those refactorings/deprecations in the future to not
> cause too much change in those places!
>
> Dominik.
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 11:10 AM, David North <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Your image didn't come through. I see the following inside the poi-3.15
>> directory of poi-src-3.15-20160828.zip:
>>
>> legal
>> osgi
>> sonar
>> src
>> test-data
>> build.xml
>> forrest.properties
>> KEYS
>> LICENSE
>> NOTICE
>> patch.xml
>>
>> Which are unwanted? This seems to match the src packages in the last beta.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> David
>>
>> On 22/08/16 07:47, Dominik Stadler wrote:
>> > Sorry, me again,
>> >
>> > Unfortunately there are still some unwanted artifacts in the
>> > src-package, can you remove those as well?
>> >
>> >
>> > Inline image 1
>> >
>> > While not blocking the release, but the Java version used for the build
>> > seems to be "1.6.0_34", which is a bit outdated, latest (and last)
>> > version of Java 6 is patchlevel 45, would look better to use this one to
>> > build releases.
>> >
>> > Dominik.
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 12:49 AM, David North <[email protected]
>> > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Vote begins now and ends at 11:55 BST 2016-08-23
>> >
>> > Artifacts are here:
>> >
>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/poi/3.15-RC1/
>> > <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/poi/3.15-RC1/>
>> >
>> > Usual checks required (does it work? does the distribution look
>> right?),
>> > only more so as this is an RC for a non-beta release.
>> >
>> > +1 from me.
>> >
>> > As those of you watching the commits may have seen, I can't get the
>> svn
>> > commits from ant to work on either of my machines (Debian stable or
>> > Fedora 22) - I thought I'd fixed it by upgrading to svn 1.9, but
>> > seemingly not. I've therefore replaced them with "exec" tasks calling
>> > the SVN command line client. This needs further investigation.
>> >
>> > I also had to manually strip out the spurious "trunk" directory from
>> the
>> > src zip/tar, so that's another fix needed somewhere in the build
>> > scripts.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> >
>> > --
>> > David North | www.dnorth.net <http://www.dnorth.net>
>> >
>> >
>>
>> --
>> David North - Committer and PMC Member, Apache POI
>> https://home.apache.org/~dnorth/
>>
>>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
