https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60397
Marc <m...@schregardus.com.au> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEEDINFO |NEW
--- Comment #2 from Marc <m...@schregardus.com.au> ---
Hi Javen,
Thanks for the info - the unsafe method is definitely faster (and I'll update
all our code to use it, as there are tests in place to ensure the spreadsheets
are rendered correctly - so corruption shouldn't be an issue). However, it's
still a lot slower than not using any merged cells. I've run the following
benchmark tests to demonstrate:
2000 Rows
- No merging -> 1 second
- Unsafe merging -> 2 seconds
- Safe merging -> 33 seconds
10,000 Rows
- No merging -> 2 seconds
- Unsafe merging -> 39 seconds
- Safe merging - > hadn't completed after 5 mins, so gave up :-)
Cheers,
Marc
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org
