Hi,

I see similar behaviour also on Monday mornings, so no sign of missing
outdoor-time :)

Seems there is some difference between JDKs or other build-parameters which
cause these difference when building, would be good interesting if anybody
has a clue what the difference in build-setup is when they are created
differently.

Thanks... Dominik.

On Fri, May 7, 2021 at 6:13 PM Tim Allison <talli...@apache.org> wrote:

> Hi All,
>    I recently tried to build with Java 11 because of [1], I found that
> the build was modifying module-info.java and module-info.class.  Is
> this expected? Is the combination of the Java issue and this item a
> sign I should put down the keyboard for the weekend a bit early?
>
>  Cheers,
>
>                Tim
>
> svn diff
> Index: poi-ooxml-lite/src/main/java9/module-info.class
> ===================================================================
> Cannot display: file marked as a binary type.
> svn:mime-type = application/octet-stream
> Index: poi-ooxml-lite/src/main/java9/module-info.java
> ===================================================================
> --- poi-ooxml-lite/src/main/java9/module-info.java    (revision 1889636)
> +++ poi-ooxml-lite/src/main/java9/module-info.java    (working copy)
> @@ -29,7 +29,6 @@
>      exports com.microsoft.schemas.office.excel;
>      exports com.microsoft.schemas.office.office;
>      exports com.microsoft.schemas.office.visio.x2012.main;
> -    exports com.microsoft.schemas.office.word;
>      exports com.microsoft.schemas.office.x2006.digsig;
>      exports com.microsoft.schemas.vml;
>      exports org.apache.poi.schemas.ooxml.system.ooxml;
>
> [1] https://bugs.java.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=JDK-8266261
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org
>
>

Reply via email to