I personally like uv a bit more due to my experience with both tools. I'm supportive of switching to uv. We mighty give a bit more time to let people chime in in case of compatibility issues.
Yufei On Thu, Jan 8, 2026 at 4:39 PM Dmitri Bourlatchkov <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Yong, > > I do not have a personal opinion on python tooling, but switching to uv as > the more performant option looks reasonable to me. > > Cheers, > Dmitri. > > On Thu, Jan 8, 2026 at 6:43 PM Yong Zheng <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > Currently we have 2 python based tools (polaris client and polaris mcp) > > and they are using poetry and uv. Both poetry and uv are very popular > > options for python package managements. Currently Polaris client is using > > poetry while polaris mcp is using uv. I think it may makes sense to > switch > > with one to avoid technical debt for maintaining two package managers as > > well as CI pipelines. Personally, I like uv more than poetry due to the > > speed uv provides during dependencies resolutions (sample reference for > > more detail comparison: > > > https://dipjyotimetia.medium.com/why-i-switched-from-poetry-to-uv-after-6-months-20d02c8f789e > ). > > Also, pyiceberg did the same switch couple months back: > > https://github.com/apache/iceberg-python/pull/2601 > > > > What do your guys think? Should we switch from poetry to uv or vice versa > > or keep them as it is for now? > > > > Thanks, > > Yong Zheng > > >
