Thank you, Dmitri. I will work on RC2 today given that all changes should
be into the release branch.

Best,
Adnan Hemani

On Tue, Apr 14, 2026 at 8:33 AM Dmitri Bourlatchkov <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hi Adnan,
>
> Actually, I double checked the code in 1.4.0 and most of the required
> changes for building the helm index appear to be present.
>
> However, there appears to be a bug in the action. It does not "add" the
> index to svn. So the missing change appears to be [4154]
>
> Here's the backport: [4199]
>
> [4154] https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/4154
>
> [4199] https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/4199
>
> Cheers,
> Dmitri.
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2026 at 10:48 AM Adnan Hemani via dev <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Hi Dmitri,
> >
> > Yes, I surely can, but I believe we will need to give some additional
> time
> > for any objections. If it’s not much trouble, could you please open the
> > cherry-pick PR and I will approve and merge it in the late afternoon (I
> may
> > not be able to do the cherry-pick until then).
> >
> > Best,
> > Adnan Hemani
> >
> > > On Apr 14, 2026, at 6:42 AM, Dmitri Bourlatchkov <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Adnan,
> > >
> > > Would you cherry-pick [3515] into the 1.4.0 release branch?
> > >
> > > I hope it's not too hard and it will help a lot with helm validation
> and
> > > publication (no manual index work).
> > >
> > > WDYT?
> > >
> > > [3515]
> >
> https://www.google.com/url?q=https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/3515&source=gmail-imap&ust=1776778923000000&usg=AOvVaw0itFoJRCdhYNOG2aCVZRnY
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Dmitri.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >> On Thu, Apr 9, 2026 at 4:51 PM Dmitri Bourlatchkov <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Hi Adnan,
> > >>
> > >> The new helm index process was added in [3515], but I guess it was not
> > >> reflected on `dev`.
> > >>
> > >> The closest `dev` thread on this topic that I could find is [1].
> > >>
> > >> Still, I think the PR is pretty clear. Quoting from its description:
> > >>
> > >>> The goal is that the exact same Helm chart index can be promoted to
> > dist
> > >> release
> > >>> after a vote succeeds. I.e. we do not need to re-generate it in the
> 4th
> > >> workflow.
> > >>
> > >> I believe it is a solid approach and I assumed we would follow it for
> > >> 1.4.0. WDYT?
> > >>
> > >> [1]
> >
> https://www.google.com/url?q=https://lists.apache.org/thread/wo353z4scyj85bw4lfk5onc28xgznvwp&source=gmail-imap&ust=1776778923000000&usg=AOvVaw3lNB7XhU-rX1P3cuyj2ijl
> > >>
> > >> [3515]
> >
> https://www.google.com/url?q=https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/3515&source=gmail-imap&ust=1776778923000000&usg=AOvVaw0itFoJRCdhYNOG2aCVZRnY
> > >>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >> Dmitri.
> > >>
> > >> On Wed, Apr 8, 2026 at 11:03 PM Adnan Hemani via dev <
> > >> [email protected]> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Hi Dmitri,
> > >>>
> > >>> Thanks for the verifications. The email .txt files were generated as
> > part
> > >>> of the automated release process - I'm really not sure why those are
> > there
> > >>> either, but didn't change it since I didn't find it to be a big
> issue.
> > I'm
> > >>> happy to make a change to remove them for the next release (or as
> part
> > of
> > >>> this release if RC1 doesn't pass).
> > >>>
> > >>> I'm not familiar on the helm index background, but can confirm that
> > there
> > >>> was not an "index.yaml" file generated as part of the GitHub Action.
> > >>> Robert/Pierre, is this something you can confirm that we had
> consensus
> > on
> > >>> doing and if the current release should've done this?
> > >>>
> > >>> Best,
> > >>> Adnan Hemani
> > >>>
> > >>> On Tue, Apr 7, 2026 at 12:24 PM Dmitri Bourlatchkov <
> [email protected]>
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> Hi All,
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Voting +0 for now because of the two strange .txt files and helm
> index
> > >>>> issue (below)
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Verified:
> > >>>> * Checksums
> > >>>> * Signatures
> > >>>> * Build from source
> > >>>>
> > >>>> So far all clear.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> However:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> $ helm repo add polaris-rc
> > >>>>
> >
> https://www.google.com/url?q=https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/polaris/helm-chart&source=gmail-imap&ust=1776778923000000&usg=AOvVaw33mKHPsKmP1hWtp1ddptOi
> > >>>> Error: looks like "
> > >>>>
> >
> https://www.google.com/url?q=https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/polaris/helm-chart&source=gmail-imap&ust=1776778923000000&usg=AOvVaw33mKHPsKmP1hWtp1ddptOi
> > "
> > >>>> is not a valid chart repository or cannot be reached: failed to
> fetch
> > >>>>
> >
> https://www.google.com/url?q=https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/polaris/helm-chart/index.yaml&source=gmail-imap&ust=1776778923000000&usg=AOvVaw1JUUwVlAP5s8rkHtehPQhU
> > :
> > >>> 404
> > >>>> Not Found
> > >>>>
> > >>>> IIRC, the idea was for the RCs to host a new helm index verbatim.
> The
> > >>> index
> > >>>> will then replace the old index at release publication time. This
> way
> > >>> we'd
> > >>>> be able to validate its exact contents before making it available to
> > all
> > >>>> users.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> WDYT?
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Cheers,
> > >>>> Dmitri.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Tue, Apr 7, 2026 at 3:10 PM Dmitri Bourlatchkov <
> [email protected]>
> > >>>> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> Hi Adnan,
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> I see these two files in dist... Do we really need them there?
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> apache-polaris-1.4.0.vote-email-body.txt
> > >>>>> apache-polaris-1.4.0.vote-email-subject.txt
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Thanks,
> > >>>>> Dmitri.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On Mon, Apr 6, 2026 at 9:37 PM Adnan Hemani via dev <
> > >>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> Hi everyone,
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> I propose that we release the following RC as the official Apache
> > >>>> Polaris
> > >>>>>> 1.4.0 release. (Do not worry, there is no RC0 for this release :)
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> This corresponds to the tag: apache-polaris-1.4.0-rc1
> > >>>>>> *
> >
> https://www.google.com/url?q=https://github.com/apache/polaris/commits/apache-polaris-1.4.0-rc1&source=gmail-imap&ust=1776778923000000&usg=AOvVaw0GBNTp4JlIg36vKooxqITv
> > >>>>>> *
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> >
> https://www.google.com/url?q=https://github.com/apache/polaris/tree/70f7a0288412f80197fca71d5f635ca221eb6331&source=gmail-imap&ust=1776778923000000&usg=AOvVaw3XoVHvgxXLolmhLXAekQdw
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> The release tarball, signature, and checksums are here:
> > >>>>>> *
> >
> https://www.google.com/url?q=https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/polaris/1.4.0&source=gmail-imap&ust=1776778923000000&usg=AOvVaw3p3muO0OeZvqN5qPW-pe-3
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Helm charts are available on:
> > >>>>>> *
> >
> https://www.google.com/url?q=https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/polaris/helm-chart/1.4.0&source=gmail-imap&ust=1776778923000000&usg=AOvVaw3oWqQNHYJoiKVHDD8J4t5U
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> NB: you have to build the Docker images locally in order to test
> > Helm
> > >>>>>> charts.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> You can find the KEYS file here:
> > >>>>>> *
> >
> https://www.google.com/url?q=https://downloads.apache.org/polaris/KEYS&source=gmail-imap&ust=1776778923000000&usg=AOvVaw1zXDcTFnw8C1rtsmLlV1Qb
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Convenience binary artifacts are staged on Nexus. The Maven
> > >>> repositories
> > >>>>>> URLs are:
> > >>>>>> *
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> >
> https://www.google.com/url?q=https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachepolaris-1063/&source=gmail-imap&ust=1776778923000000&usg=AOvVaw2hgo6YTkEKtzzbThOsZO3L
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Please download, verify, and test according to the release
> > >>> verification
> > >>>>>> guide, which can be found at:
> > >>>>>> *
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> >
> https://www.google.com/url?q=https://polaris.apache.org/community/release-guides/release-verification-guide/&source=gmail-imap&ust=1776778923000000&usg=AOvVaw0Al64-hLxzsW095ZrN9gx3
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Please vote in the next 96 hours (extra time given due to Iceberg
> > >>>> Summit).
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> [ ] +1 Release this as Apache Polaris 1.4.0
> > >>>>>> [ ] +0
> > >>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this because...
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Only PMC members have binding votes, but other community members
> are
> > >>>>>> encouraged to cast non-binding votes.
> > >>>>>> This vote will pass if there are 3 binding +1 votes and more
> binding
> > >>> +1
> > >>>>>> votes than -1 votes.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Best,
> > >>>>>> Adnan Hemani
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
>

Reply via email to