Hi all,
reviving this thread from last year.
There are a couple of branches in the Polaris repo again that look like
topic/temporary branches (see below).
Some of them might be intentional or still active, so asking first before
deleting anything.
Any objections to cleaning those up beginning of next week?
Thoughts?
Robert
For reference:
commit c1d8f4c1967d298be82311a1c03af97d21d7f5ba (github/blogs)
AuthorDate: Tue, 4 Nov 2025 00:56:49 +0530
CommitDate: Mon, 3 Nov 2025 11:26:49 -0800
Remove all content except site/content/blog from blogs branch (#2968)
commit b75d424802349347c5a788f3e40efafd8c7c2f20
(github/mcollado-catalog-admin-revoke)
AuthorDate: Mon, 9 Mar 2026 16:02:30 -0700
CommitDate: Mon, 9 Mar 2026 16:02:30 -0700
Fixed name collisions in integration test
commit a85a23d0e58491486e3b316bf767208b6418ca50
(github/revert-3859-renovate/jackson-monorepo)
AuthorDate: Mon, 23 Feb 2026 06:44:39 +0100
CommitDate: Mon, 23 Feb 2026 06:44:39 +0100
Revert "Update dependency com.fasterxml.jackson:jackson-bom to v2.21.1
(#3859)"
commit 5f6bc6ab8e45a80c5de791b4459d64d34d710ddb
(github/yzou-generic-table-credential-vending)
AuthorDate: Mon, 27 Apr 2026 10:31:01 -0700
CommitDate: Fri, 1 May 2026 10:48:43 -0700
fix spotless check
commit bdc597b03739b018a8e9418e75d000565155c92f
(github/yzou-generic-table-credential-vending-specs)
AuthorDate: Tue, 17 Feb 2026 14:01:40 -0800
CommitDate: Wed, 18 Feb 2026 10:48:27 -0800
add change
commit 62404e71a3e89e383aa52c0ac1bb76bdb4181deb
(github/yzou-generic-table-location-validation)
AuthorDate: Wed, 27 May 2026 19:10:00 -0700
CommitDate: Wed, 27 May 2026 19:10:00 -0700
add test
On Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 5:02 PM Dmitri Bourlatchkov <[email protected]>
wrote:
> Hi Kenneth,
>
> Slightly off topic to this thread, but you might be interested in the
> "evolution" PR [1] and the related dev email [2] from the "user side". Any
> feedback is welcome.
>
> [1] https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/1890
> [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/c0sk6hmtz9l4vs0mjc21wvlpblqhgx7r
>
> Thanks,
> Dmitri.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 10:58 AM Kenneth Kang
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > My team has been tracking the 0.9 and 0.10 branches. They haven't
> > diverged too much from their branching points off main. I am good with
> > pruning the branches to focus usage to current versions.
> >
> > Kenneth
> >
> > On 6/16/25 07:57, Dmitri Bourlatchkov wrote:
> > > Dropping the 0.9 release branch, and keeping the tag (of course) SGTM.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Dmitri.
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jun 16, 2025 at 10:54 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]
> >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> That's a good point.
> > >>
> > >> Rethinking about that, if we keep the tag, I think we are good to
> > >> remove release/0.9.x branch (and the "old" 0.9 rc tags).
> > >>
> > >> Regards
> > >> JB
> > >>
> > >> On Mon, Jun 16, 2025 at 3:57 PM Robert Stupp <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >>> I've deleted all branches except the 0.9 one.
> > >>>
> > >>> Do we really maintain 0.9? It's quite old and we said it's a
> > source-only
> > >>> release.
> > >>>
> > >>> On 13.06.25 14:21, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> > >>>> Hi
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I agree to delete release/0.10 branch (as it's not used anymore).
> > >>>>
> > >>>> However, I would keep release/0.9 for now as we did a release on
> this
> > >>>> branch, so we could have a request from the community to do a new
> > >>>> release (0.9.1, etc), even if I don't think it will happen :)
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Regards
> > >>>> JB
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Fri, Jun 13, 2025 at 1:56 PM Robert Stupp <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > >>>>> Deleting the release/0.9+10 branches is fine for me.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Any objections to delete those?
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On 13.06.25 03:35, Michael Collado wrote:
> > >>>>>> I have no objections. Any of my old branches are there purely
> > >> accidentally.
> > >>>>>> Mike
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> On Thu, Jun 12, 2025 at 1:48 PM Yufei Gu <[email protected]>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>>>>>> +1, I'm all for keeping the code base and repo clean. Deleted
> > >>>>>>> branch yufei-test-1.0.x and 1.0.x. I think we can also delete
> > >>>>>>> branch "release/0.10.x" as the 0.10 release was cancelled.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Yufei
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 12, 2025 at 8:30 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <
> > >> [email protected]>
> > >>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Hi
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> I deleted my "old" branches. Sorry about that.
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Agree to keep the "branches clean".
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Regards
> > >>>>>>>> JB
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 12, 2025 at 10:26 AM Robert Stupp <[email protected]>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>> Hi guys,
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> I noticed that there are a bunch of stale branches and branches
> > >> that
> > >>>>>>>>> look like experiments in the Polaris GitHub repository
> > >>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/polaris/ (see below).
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Generally, I think only the technically necessary branches
> should
> > >> be in
> > >>>>>>>>> the Polaris GH repo. Those are: main, asf-site, versioned-docs
> > and
> > >>>>>>>>> release/*.
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Another aspect why we should refrain from prematurely creating
> > >> branches
> > >>>>>>>>> in the https://github.com/apache/polaris/ repo is that
> workflows
> > >> in
> > >>>>>>>>> these branches can gain access to secrets, which is a concern
> at
> > >> least
> > >>>>>>>>> for me.
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> I'd go ahead and delete the branches mentioned below beginning
> of
> > >> next
> > >>>>>>>>> week, if nobody objects.
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Thoughts?
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Robert
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> commit 1b0c0499a4c68e08138b43e151eb41a89b6f53e0
> > >>>>>>>>> (github/configuring-polaris-for-production)
> > >>>>>>>>> Author: annafil <[email protected]>
> > >>>>>>>>> AuthorDate: Thu Aug 1 09:23:18 2024 -0700
> > >>>>>>>>> Commit: annafil <[email protected]>
> > >>>>>>>>> CommitDate: Thu Aug 1 09:23:18 2024 -0700
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> ensure new links are rendered in web
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> commit 48d220fab6441a15e4d681b73a093e9b8ada3620
> > >> (github/jbonofre-11)
> > >>>>>>>>> Author: JB Onofré <[email protected]>
> > >>>>>>>>> AuthorDate: Wed Jul 31 16:12:03 2024 +0200
> > >>>>>>>>> Commit: JB Onofré <[email protected]>
> > >>>>>>>>> CommitDate: Wed Jul 31 16:12:03 2024 +0200
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Force user.language as some tests are locale dependent
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> commit fe0ef3d50f9f133ca1998ab8bba33ca407be75f1
> > >> (github/jbonofre-asf)
> > >>>>>>>>> Author: JB Onofré <[email protected]>
> > >>>>>>>>> AuthorDate: Wed Aug 21 19:16:28 2024 +0200
> > >>>>>>>>> Commit: JB Onofré <[email protected]>
> > >>>>>>>>> CommitDate: Wed Aug 21 19:16:28 2024 +0200
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Add DISCLAIMER_WIP
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> commit 92797e485cfe509854085708b443b3c6a1107a31
> > >>>>>>>>> (github/mcollado-authn-resolve-roles)
> > >>>>>>>>> Author: Michael Collado <[email protected]>
> > >>>>>>>>> AuthorDate: Fri Jan 10 17:05:45 2025 -0800
> > >>>>>>>>> Commit: Michael Collado <[email protected]>
> > >>>>>>>>> CommitDate: Fri Jan 10 17:08:28 2025 -0800
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Removed injected security context
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> commit 1a6b3eb3963355f78c5ca916cc1d66ecd1493092
> > >> (github/public-release)
> > >>>>>>>>> Author: Robert Stupp <[email protected]>
> > >>>>>>>>> AuthorDate: Tue Jul 30 13:38:08 2024 +0200
> > >>>>>>>>> Commit: Michael Collado <[email protected]>
> > >>>>>>>>> CommitDate: Tue Jul 30 07:30:21 2024 -0700
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Spotless, license header, add xml (#25)
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> commit 3ea8db436ad08ab5053ad44c3d0127dccd1cae0d
> > >>>>>>>>> (github/revert-806-bootstrap-only-root)
> > >>>>>>>>> Author: Eric Maynard <[email protected]>
> > >>>>>>>>> AuthorDate: Wed Jan 22 10:00:23 2025 -0800
> > >>>>>>>>> Commit: GitHub <[email protected]>
> > >>>>>>>>> CommitDate: Wed Jan 22 10:00:23 2025 -0800
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Revert "Simplify credentials format when bootstrapping
> > >> (#806)"
> > >>>>>>>>> This reverts commit
> > >> 4eee4fe00eb834655f24c57d697764984f3f4731.
> > >>>>>>>>> commit f393a1dd4d1ff6416e37255f60ada9ac51ece13b
> > >>>>>>> (github/yufei-test-1.0.x)
> > >>>>>>>>> Author: Prashant Singh <
> > >>>>>>> [email protected]
> > >>>>>>>>> AuthorDate: Fri Jun 6 11:26:48 2025 -0700
> > >>>>>>>>> Commit: GitHub <[email protected]>
> > >>>>>>>>> CommitDate: Fri Jun 6 11:26:48 2025 -0700
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> JDBC: Use PreparedStatement (#1802)
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>>>> Robert Stupp
> > >>>>>>>>> @snazy
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>> --
> > >>>>> Robert Stupp
> > >>>>> @snazy
> > >>>>>
> >
>
