Thanks JB, The report looks good to me overall. Nice summary of both the project's technical progress and community health. One minor suggestion: can we also mention the semantic model and tagging discussion given that data sharing and openlineage are included?
Yufei On Wed, Jul 29, 2026 at 9:06 AM Alexandre Dutra <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi JB, > > The report looks good to me, thanks for putting up the draft. > > Thanks, > Alex > > On Wed, Jul 29, 2026 at 2:14 PM Francois Papon > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > LGTM > > > > Thanks for the report > > > > regards, > > > > François > > [email protected] > > [email protected] > > > > Le 29/07/2026 à 07:00, Jean-Baptiste Onofré a écrit : > > > Hi folks, > > > > > > We have to report this month. > > > > > > I drafted the following report: > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > ## Description: > > > The mission of Apache Polaris is the creation and maintenance of > software > > > related to a catalog for data lakes. It provides new levels of choice, > > > flexibility and control over data, with full enterprise security and > Apache > > > Iceberg interoperability across a multitude of engines and > infrastructure > > > > > > ## Project Status: > > > Current project status: Healthy and active. > > > This is Apache Polaris's first quarterly board report, following the > > > initial monthly > > > reports filed after the project graduated to a Top-Level Project on > 2026-02-18. > > > The transition out of incubation has been smooth: the project has > established > > > and sustained a monthly release cadence, the PMC is operating > independently > > > and in the Apache Way, development activity remains high, and several > > > substantial feature proposals are under active discussion on the dev > list. > > > > > > Compared with the previous report(s): the most notable change is the > shift from > > > monthly to quarterly reporting itself, marking the project's settling > into a > > > normal TLP rhythm. The release train established immediately > post-graduation has > > > continued without slippage (two feature releases plus a patch this > period). The > > > character of activity has also evolved (where the earlier reports > centered on > > > the graduation transition and post-graduation stabilization), this > quarter the > > > community has moved toward expanding the catalog's scope, with major > design > > > proposals (Data Sharing, OpenLineage, Polaris Directory) now under > active > > > discussion. Committer growth continued with one addition. > > > > > > Issues for the board: There are no issues requiring the board's > attention at > > > this time. > > > > > > ## Membership Data: > > > Apache Polaris was founded 2026-02-18 (5 months ago) > > > There are currently 32 committers and 19 PMC members in this project. > > > The Committer-to-PMC ratio is roughly 8:5. > > > > > > Community changes, past quarter: > > > - No new PMC members. Last addition was Sung Yun on 2026-04-27. > > > - Nándor Kollár was added as committer on 2026-06-30 > > > > > > ## Project Activity: > > > The project maintained its monthly release cadence throughout the > quarter, > > > continuing the train established right after graduation: > > > - 1.6.0 released 2026-07-08 > > > - 1.5.0 released 2026-05-18 > > > - (1.4.1, a patch release, shipped 2026-05-01 at the start of the > period) > > > > > > Development throughput on GitHub (apache/polaris) remained high over > the > > > reporting window (May–July 2026): > > > - Pull requests: 761 opened, 651 merged > > > - Issues: 90 opened, 91 closed > > > - Currently open: 102 pull requests, 256 issues > > > The high merge count relative to issues reflects a fast-moving, > PR-driven > > > workflow with a healthy review throughput. > > > > > > Recent release work has focused on hardening the project for > production use, > > > including running event listeners on a dedicated configurable > executor, an > > > updated MaintenanceService API, and stricter REST-layer validation of > entity > > > names. Broader ongoing themes include catalog federation, credential > vending, > > > and governance/policy integration. > > > > > > Several notable feature proposals and design discussions are active on > the > > > dev list this quarter, reflecting a shift from stabilization toward > expanding > > > the catalog's scope: > > > - Data Sharing / Catalog Sharing: a design for securely sharing catalog > > > namespaces and tables (metadata pointers) with external accounts > and partner > > > engines without copying data, including recipient credentials and > revocation. > > > - OpenLineage: a sustained proposal thread exploring how Polaris > should emit > > > and integrate lineage information, positioning the catalog as a > lineage/ > > > observability plane. This pairs with related discussions on REST > endpoints > > > exposing table metrics and events. > > > - Polaris Directory: a proposal for a directory/volume-style > abstraction to > > > organize files and unstructured data within the catalog, extending > Polaris > > > beyond Iceberg tables toward broader data-asset management. > > > > > > Release voting, discussion, and decision-making continue to take place > on the > > > public dev@ list in accordance with the Apache Way. > > > > > > ## Community Health: > > > Community health is good. Development is broadly distributed: 58 > distinct > > > authors opened pull requests against apache/polaris during the > quarter, a > > > strong contributor-diversity signal for a project only a few months > past > > > graduation. The project added one new committer this quarter (Nándor > Kollár, > > > 2026-06-30), reflecting continued growth of the contributor base on > merit. The > > > committer and PMC rolls remain diverse, spanning multiple cloud > providers, > > > engine and governance vendors, and independent contributors, which > keeps the > > > project vendor-neutral and resilient to any single contributor's > departure. > > > > > > The volume and substance of design discussion on the dev list > (spanning data > > > sharing, lineage, and unstructured-data support) indicates an engaged > > > community debating the project's direction openly. There were no new > PMC > > > members this quarter; the PMC will continue to watch for sustained > contributors > > > who are candidates for invitation. > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > Please let me know if you have any comments or changes. Since this is > > > the first quarterly report, we don't need to detail every single > > > change we did (it's impossible); we should provide overall insights > > > into community and project activity. > > > > > > I will send the report by the end of the week. > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > Regards > > > JB >
