Hi EJ, Thanks for the update.
I think 24 hours is very short notice to schedule a meeting, and I hope people will still be able to join to ensure a diverse audience. Moving forward, I would suggest giving a few days' notice to ensure everyone has a chance to attend. Regards, JB On Thu, Jul 30, 2026 at 2:16 AM EJ Wang <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi folks, just FYI, the review is scheduled for Pacific time Jul 29, > 9-10am, it has scheduled via Polaris google calendar. Come and join! > > -ej > > On Thu, Jul 16, 2026 at 9:52 PM EJ Wang <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Hi folks, > > > > I have prepared a Google Doc > > <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rIJGzcsmGhfrBiRXPac51hr-jeJuuKQQBYjgBdOb9-k/edit?usp=sharing> > > for the Polaris tag spec proposal. > > > > The goal is simple: add a native tag model to Polaris so users can > > classify catalog objects, read those classifications back, and find objects > > by tag. > > > > The proposal covers: > > * tag definitions as catalog-scoped Polaris entities > > * tag assignments on catalogs, namespaces, table-like objects, and columns > > * allowed values on tag definitions > > * direct and inherited tag reads > > * direct by-tag lookup > > * the durable model behind the API > > * how this compares with the existing Polaris Policy API (tag design > > referenced policy heavily, given their pattern similarity) > > > > Please take a look and leave comments in the doc. Let me know WDYT! > > > > I would also like to discuss this in the July 23 community sync. A > > separate dedicated review meeting will be scheduled separately, likely > > within the next two weeks. > > > > Thanks, > > -ej > >
