+1 for option 1 as stated in the PR as well.

Thanks,
Yong

On 2026/09/17 05:46:46 Ayush Saxena wrote:
> Hi Yufei, JB,
> 
> +1 to option 1: default LIST_PAGINATION_ENABLED to true and keep the flag 
> (including the catalog-level polaris.config.list-pagination-enabled override) 
> as an escape hatch for a couple of releases and then maybe drop as JB 
> mentioned
> 
> -Ayush
> 
> On 2026/09/17 05:23:38 Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> > Hi Yufei
> > 
> > By default, LIST_PAGINATION_MAX_PAGE_SIZE is -1 (unlimited), so
> > changing LIST_PAGINATION_ENABLED to true doesn't have impact for any
> > client that doesn't send pageToken/pageSize, so it's not a breaking
> > change.
> > 
> > We can remove this flag after a couple of releases, as we did for
> > other flag in the past.
> > 
> > So, +1 to enable pagination by default.
> > 
> > Regards
> > JB
> > 
> > On Thu, Sep 17, 2026 at 5:28 AM Yufei Gu <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi everyone,
> > >
> > > Following up on the discussion in PR #5385
> > > <https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/5385#discussion_r4021046514>, I’d
> > > like to propose enabling list pagination by default.
> > >
> > > Currently, LIST_PAGINATION_ENABLED defaults to false, so users need to
> > > enable it before clients can use pagination, including the Python CLI’s 
> > > new
> > > --page-size option.
> > >
> > > Enabling the flag does not force pagination on existing clients: requests
> > > that omit both pageToken and pageSize still receive the full list. 
> > > Changing
> > > the default would let clients request pagination without an extra server
> > > configuration step, while preserving the behavior of requests that do not
> > > ask for it.
> > >
> > > I see two options:
> > >
> > >    1.
> > >
> > >    Default the flag to true, retaining the ability to disable pagination.
> > >    2.
> > >
> > >    Remove the flag and always support pagination when requested.
> > >
> > > I lean toward enabling it by default first, keeping the flag as an escape
> > > hatch. We could consider removing it later if there is no remaining need 
> > > to
> > > disable pagination.
> > >
> > > Are there compatibility concerns, known impl. limitations, or operational
> > > reasons to keep pagination disabled by default? Would others prefer
> > > removing the flag altogether?
> > > Yufei
> > 
> 

Reply via email to