[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIO-193?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16678246#comment-16678246
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on PIO-193:
------------------------------------

takezoe edited a comment on issue #495: [PIO-193] Async support for predict 
method and storage access, blocking code wrapped in blocking construct
URL: https://github.com/apache/predictionio/pull/495#issuecomment-436630580
 
 
   Thanks for great work. However I think this way isn't acceptable because it 
breaks current interfaces. This means that all existing templates won't work 
after this change.
   
   Async support in entire prediction service is really nice but we need to 
find another way.

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


> Use async requests to storage whenever possible
> -----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: PIO-193
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIO-193
>             Project: PredictionIO
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Core
>    Affects Versions: 0.13.0
>            Reporter: Chris Wewerka
>            Priority: Major
>
> The storage access in Prediction IO uses blocking drivers and uses the 
> standard scala ExecutionContext which is a bounded ForkJoin ThreadPool. This 
> leads to bad usage of machines resources.
>  
> See also 
> [https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/f14e4f8f29410e4585b3d8e9f646b88293a605f4716d3c4d60771854@%3Cuser.predictionio.apache.org%3E]
> and https://jira.apache.org/jira/browse/PIO-182



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to