This is the voting thread for PIP-117. It will stay open for at least 48h.

https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/13302

----

## Motivation

Pulsar standalone is the "Pulsar in a box" version of a Pulsar cluster, where
all the components are started within the context of a single JVM process.

Users are using the standalone as a way to get quickly started with Pulsar or
in all the cases where it makes sense to have a single node deployment.

Right now, the standalone is starting by default with many components,
several of
which are quite complex, since they are designed to be deployed in a distributed
fashion.

## Goal

Simplify the components of Pulsar standalone to achieve:

 1. Reduce complexity
 2. Reduce startup time
 3. Reduce memory and CPU footprint of running standalone

## Proposed changes

The proposal here is to change some of the default implementations that are
used for the Pulsar standalone.

 1. **Metadata Store implementation** -->
      Change from ZooKeeper to RocksDB

 2. **Pulsar functions package backend** -->
      Change from using DistributedLog to using local filesystem, storing the
      jars directly in the data folder instead of uploading them into BK.

 3. **Pulsar functions state store implementation** -->
      Change the state store to be backed by a MetadataStore based backed,
      with the RocksDB implementation.

 4. **Table Service** -->
      Do not start BK table service by default

## Compatibility considerations

In order to avoid compatibility issues where users have existing Pulsar
standalone services that they want to upgrade without conflicts, we will
follow the principle of keeping the old defaults where there is existing
data on the disk.

We will add a file, serving the purpose as a flag, in the `data/standalone`
directory, for example `new-2.10-defaults`.

If the file is present, or if the data directory is completely missing, we
will adopt the new set of default configuration settings.

If the file is not there, we will continue to use existing defaults and we will
not break the upgrade operation.


--
Matteo Merli
<mme...@apache.org>

Reply via email to