BTW +1 I hope we will review carefully what we are including in the release
And that we will let branch-2.9 stabilise by not adding any other commits that are not strictly required: - security related issues - data loss/data corruption cases Enrico Thank you Ran Gao for starting this thread. Enrico Il Mer 5 Gen 2022, 17:29 Enrico Olivelli <[email protected]> ha scritto: > 171 commits? > > Why? > > This is too much in my opinion for a point release. > > I am pretty sure that we don't need all that changes. > > Every change we cherry pick has a good chance to break the stability > > Enrico > > Il Mer 5 Gen 2022, 16:30 mattison chao <[email protected]> ha > scritto: > >> +1 >> >> regards, >> Mattisonchao >> >> On Wed, 5 Jan 2022 at 23:04, Lan Liang <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > +1,Thanks for your work. >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > Best Regards, >> > Lan Liang >> > On 1/5/2022 23:01，Hang Chen<[email protected]> wrote： >> > +1 >> > >> > Best, >> > Hang >> > >> > 陳智弘 <[email protected]> 于2022年1月5日周三 21:30写道： >> > >> > +1 >> > >> > Lari Hotari <[email protected]> 於 2022年1月5日 週三 20:56 寫道： >> > >> > +1 >> > >> > On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 11:23 AM Ran Gao <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > Hello, Pulsar community: >> > >> > I'd like to propose that we release Apache Pulsar 2.9.2. >> > >> > Currently, compared to 2.9.1, branch-2.9 already merged 171 >> commits(refer >> > to [0]), they contain the log4j security patch and many important fixes. >> > >> > I am happy to volunteer to be the release manager. >> > >> > I see 4 merged PRs are labeled release/2.9.2 but not cherry-pick to >> > branch-2.9, I'll cherry-pick them, and there are also 20 open PRs are >> > labeled release/2.9.2, I'll follow them to make sure important fix could >> > be >> > merged in 2.9.2. >> > >> > >> > Best, >> > Ran Gao >> > >> > >> > [0] https://github.com/apache/pulsar/compare/v2.9.1...branch-2.9 >> > >> > >> > >> >
