Il Mer 20 Lug 2022, 18:05 Yan Zhao <horizo...@apache.org> ha scritto:
> Hi, Enrico. If we bind the the topic with per-tenant, when tenant be > deleted or the tenant not be load anymore, we data in the tennat system > topic can't be consumed before the tenant next load. > This is a good point. So let's go with the system topic. Thanks Are we adding a configuratio flag? Enrico > On 2022/07/14 15:35:16 Enrico Olivelli wrote: > > This is very interesting. > > > > I have only one concern. > > I think that we should at least use a per-tenant system topic, or, > > better, per-namespace. > > There is no need to create the deletion topic if there is nothing to > delete. > > > > I am used to dealing with Pulsar clusters in which Tenants are > > strictly isolated. > > Introducing another component that is not tenant aware it kind of a > > problem (we already have such problem with the Transaction > > Coordinator) > > > > Enrico >
