+1

Documentation will definitely benefit from it.

Best,
Max Xu


On Wed, Jul 27, 2022 at 12:19 PM Huanli Meng <hua...@streamnative.io.invalid>
wrote:

> +1 as it may save a lot of effort and time for both the release manager
> and TWs.
>
> BR//Huanli
>
> > On Jul 27, 2022, at 11:33 AM, Liu Yu <li...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > +1 for this proposal since it improves the efficiency of managing docs.
> >
> > We'll take it as we reach a lazy consensus and implement this plan if
> there is no objection until tomorrow.
> >
> > On 2022/07/25 09:13:50 M Jun wrote:
> >> Hi Asaf,
> >>
> >> The doc files for all older versions are independent copies, stored at
> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/tree/master/site2/website/versioned_docs.
> >>
> >> For example, the doc for 2.10.0 was a copy saved from the next (master)
> doc at that milestone.
> >> ________________________________
> >> 发件人: Asaf Mesika <asaf.mes...@gmail.com>
> >> 发送时间: 2022年7月24日 21:00
> >> 收件人: dev@pulsar.apache.org <dev@pulsar.apache.org>
> >> 主题: Re: [Discuss] PIP-190: Simplify Pulsar documentation release and
> maintenance strategy
> >>
> >> If I understand correctly, using tags, you can automatically create the
> >> docs for the next minor version?
> >> So for older minor versions, where those files will be at? using tags
> from
> >> git?
> >>
> >> On Sat, Jul 23, 2022 at 7:04 AM Ma Jun <momoma...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi, Pulsar community,
> >>>
> >>> Happy weekend!
> >>>
> >>> I'd like to open a discussion about PIP-190: Simplify Pulsar
> documentation
> >>> release and maintenance strategy.
> >>>
> >>> Proposal link: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/16637.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>
> >>> ## Motivation
> >>>
> >>> This proposal is focused on improving and simplifying the release and
> >>> maintenance strategy of the existing Apache Pulsar documentation.
> >>>
> >>> In general, this proposal provides equal values and a better user
> >>> experience without sacrificing unpredictable efforts in the release and
> >>> maintenance process. The benefits include:
> >>> * Improve user experience when they look for the documentation of a
> >>> specific release.
> >>> * Optimize the doc development and release process for bug-fix
> releases:
> >>>   * Turn doc development for bug-fix releases from post-release into
> >>> just-in-time.
> >>>   * Save Release Manager’s effort in generating doc files for bug-fix
> >>> releases.
> >>> * Save a great amount of the community’s effort in syncing doc
> >>> improvements and fixes to historical doc versions that are in the
> >>> maintenance cycle.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Since there are quite a few illustrations and links in this proposal, I
> >>> didn't copy and paste the complete content into this email thread. You
> can
> >>> access the GitHub link to review the proposal with a better view.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Cheers!
> >>>
> >>> momo-jun
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
>
>

Reply via email to