Thanks for your vote.
Close this vote with 3 (+1) bindings and 5 (+1) non-bindings, 0 (-1)
------------------ ???????? ------------------
??????:
"dev"
<[email protected]>;
????????: 2022??8??24??(??????) ????8:56
??????: "dev"<[email protected]>;
????: Re: [VOTE] [PIP-169] Support split bundle by flow or qps
+1(non-binding)
Enrico Olivelli <[email protected]> ??2022??8??24?????? 15:04??????
> +1 (binding)
>
>
> Enrico
>
> Il giorno mer 24 ago 2022 alle ore 07:13 Aloys Zhang
> <[email protected]> ha scritto:
> >
> > +1
> >
> > Haiting Jiang <[email protected]> ??2022??8??24??????
12:35??????
> >
> > > +1 (non)
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Haiting
> > >
> > > On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 10:19 AM guo jiwei
<[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 (binding)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Regards
> > > > Jiwei Guo (Tboy)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 1:01 AM Heesung Sohn
> > > > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > >
> > > > > Heesung
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 10:00 AM Anon Hxy
<[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > Xiaoyu Hou
> > > > > >
> > > > > > lordcheng10 <[email protected]>
??2022??8??23?????? 15:10??????
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi Pulsar Community, I would like to start a
VOTE on "Support
> split
> > > > > bundle
> > > > > > > by flow or qps."(PIP-169)
> > > > > > > Here is the design detail:
> > > > > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/16782
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > and the discussion thread:
> > > > > > >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/cshyt10fwcjjxs93g8yf0svgwcgnshmg
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > lordcheng10
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
>
--
BR,
Qiang Huang