+1

Best regards,
Zixuan

Joe F <joefranc...@gmail.com> 于2022年8月31日周三 08:53写道:

> +1
>
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 9:37 AM Matteo Merli <matteo.me...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> >
> > --
> > Matteo Merli
> > <matteo.me...@gmail.com>
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 5:56 AM Lari Hotari <lhot...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I have drafted PIP-204: Reactive Java client for Apache Pulsar.
> > >
> > > PIP link:
> > > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/17335
> > >
> > > Here's a copy of the contents of the GH issue for your references:
> > >
> > > Motivation
> > >
> > > There's a need to "go reactive from end-to-end" when building modern
> > > reactive applications with platforms such as Spring Reactive.
> > > There are ways to adapt the Apache Pulsar Java client async API calls
> to
> > > Reactive Streams with a few lines of code.
> > > However, a lot will be missing and achieving the complete solution will
> > > require much more effort.
> > >
> > > A better solution would be to have first-class support Reactive Streams
> > in
> > > Apache Pulsar.
> > >
> > > Reactive Streams <https://www.reactive-streams.org/> is an
> > interoperability
> > > specification and there are multiple implementations for the JVM.
> > > It's not about a single programming language.
> > > For example, a Reactive client for Apache Pulsar supporting Reactive
> > > Streams can be used together with Project Reactor / Spring Reactive,
> Akka
> > > Streams, RxJava 3, Vert.x, SmallRye Mutiny (RedHat/Quarkus) and others.
> > > Goal
> > >
> > > Provide Reactive Java client for Apache Pulsar
> > >
> > > The Reactive Java client for Apache Pulsar exposes a Reactive Streams
> > > compatible Reactive client API for Apache Pulsar.
> > > Reactive programming is about non-blocking applications that are
> > > asynchronous and event-driven and require a small number of threads to
> > > scale. The Reactive Java client for Apache Pulsar supports non-blocking
> > > reactive asynchronous back pressure for producing and consuming
> messages
> > so
> > > that the producing or consuming pipeline doesn't get overwhelmed by
> > > producing or consuming.
> > > Libraries that support Reactive Streams provide a programming model
> that
> > is
> > > efficient and optimal for message producing and consuming (processing)
> > use
> > > cases.
> > > API Changes
> > >
> > > Establish a Reactive Streams compatible client API for Apache Pulsar.
> > > This client will be published in Maven central as a library.
> > > Implementation
> > >
> > > There's an existing proof-of-concept available at
> > > https://github.com/datastax/pulsar .
> > > This implementation will be used as a reference for an entirely new
> > > implementation that is started as a new repository under the Apache
> > Pulsar
> > > project.
> > >
> > > The proposal for the repository location is
> > > https://github.com/apache/pulsar-client-reactive .
> > > The Maven central group Id is "org.apache.pulsar" and the main artifact
> > id
> > > is "pulsar-client-reactive".
> > > The root package name is "org.apache.pulsar.reactive.client".
> > >
> > > The implementation will provide an interface module that abstracts the
> > > Reactive client API.
> > > This interface is implemented by wrapping the current Apache Pulsar
> Java
> > > client and adapts the existing async Java API to the the Reactive
> client
> > > API.
> > > The reason for this particular detail is that it is possible to
> provide a
> > > native Reactive client later while having the possibility to start
> > > developing applications immediately using the Reactive client API.
> > > Applications depending on the API will be able to migrate to use the
> > native
> > > Reactive client with minor or no changes when it becomes available.
> > > Anything else?
> > >
> > > By having an official Reactive Java client for Apache Pulsar, it will
> > > provide a way to contribute and improve the official client.
> > > Other opensource projects might want to provide support for using
> Apache
> > > Pulsar within reactive application frameworks. Without an official
> > reactive
> > > client, this becomes hard, since open source projects would like to use
> > > stable client dependencies instead of a hobby project provided by an
> > > individual.
> > > There are several members within the existing Apache Pulsar
> contributors
> > > and committers that have expressed the desire to contribute to a
> Reactive
> > > client for Apache Pulsar and are willing to maintain the new
> repository.
> > > With the new repository and sub-project we will most likely see new
> > active
> > > contributors and could possibly appoint new Apache Pulsar committers to
> > the
> > > project to empower the developers working on this new sub-project.
> > >
> > > I'm looking forward to the discussion.
> > >
> > >
> > > BR,
> > >
> > >
> > > Lari
> >
>

Reply via email to