Thanks, Enrico (sorry for replying late - I'm hugely backlogged on this mailing list).
I wanted to contribute what you wrote in the Contributors guide, but I couldn't find any reference to the process of PIP. Do you know where it is documented in the Pulsar website? On Thu, Sep 1, 2022 at 5:07 PM Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> wrote: > Asaf, > good question! > > Il giorno gio 1 set 2022 alle ore 15:01 Asaf Mesika > <asaf.mes...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > > > > Hi, > > > > I'm fairly new to this project and I have seen 2 options to comment to a > > PIP: > > 1. In the GitHub issue. > > 2. In the mailing list. > > > > I was wondering what is the best practice. > > > In Apache projects we generally prefer discussions on the mailing > list, because it is easier to let the community > participate in the discussions. > > Unfortunately in order to follow a discussion on GH you must actively > follow the notifications (hundreds of messages per day) > or use any other means to stay up to date. > > So we generally keep "discussions" here. > > When you go down to implementation details it is better to work on the > PR, as it is more productive. > But for high level discussion it is better that they happen here > > Discussing on the GH issue of the PIP is misleading, and I agree with > you that we should keep the discussions only in one place > > Enrico > > > > > I know there is an ongoing initiative at the moment to switch a PIP to > > become a file and actually a PR for submitting it. I guess the question > > also applies to this new scheme :) > > > > Thanks, > > > > Asaf >
