Hi, Enrico > Please note that the new test case is about non-persistent topics I'm sorry, It's my mistake, the non-persistent already fix this problem, I need to change the test topic name to persistent.
Best, Mattison On Dec 28, 2022, 16:27 +0800, Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com>, wrote: > I agree with you. > > Please note that the new test case is about non-persistent topics > > is it expected ? > > Enrico > > Il giorno mer 28 dic 2022 alle ore 07:58 Yubiao Feng > <yubiao.f...@streamnative.io.invalid> ha scritto: > > > > Hi qiang > > > > I think this is a necessary fix, and it would be nice if more explicit > > errors were given to the client. > > > > Thanks > > Yubiao > > > > On Wed, Dec 28, 2022 at 12:43 PM <mattisonc...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > Hi, All > > > > > > > > I'd like to start a discussion of this behaviour change as follow. > > > > > > > > The issue is described here: > > > > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/19085 > > > > And the fix PR here: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/19086 > > > > > > > > --- > > > > > > > > Behaviour change: > > > > > > > > Before: we can create non-existent persistent partitions. > > > > > > > > After: we will get `PulsarClientException.TopicDoesNotExistException` > > > > when > > > > we create non-existent persistent partitions. > > > > > > > > Please feel free to leave comments if you have any concerns. > > > > > > > > Best, > > > > Mattison > > > >
