+1 (Solution 2)

Thanks,
Bo

PengHui Li <peng...@apache.org> 于2023年3月29日周三 09:47写道:
>
> Looks good to me to make it optional in branch-2.10 since we don't want to
> introduce any break behaviors in the subsequent patch releases.
>
> Thanks,
> Penghui
>
> On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 9:39 PM Dezhi Liu <dezhi...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > I agree with cherry-picking PR 15121 to branch-2.10 and keep compatibility.
> >
> >
> > Best,
> > Dezhi
> >
> > On 2023/03/28 11:52:06 Yubiao Feng wrote:
> > > Hi community
> > >
> > > ### Summary
> > > The Admin client (`pulsar-admin`) and Java Client (PulsarAdmin) will
> > throw
> > > Unauthorized Ex in both scenarios:
> > > - If there have more than one broker in a cluster( see issue 1 below ).
> > > - If authentication is enabled for both Pulsar-Proxy and Pulsar-Broker(
> > see
> > > issue 2 below),
> > >
> > > ```
> > > bin/pulsar-admin topics stats persistent://public/default/tp1
> > > 2023-03-28T07:30:58,453+0000 [main] INFO
> > > org.apache.pulsar.client.impl.auth.AuthenticationSasl - JAAS loginContext
> > > is: PulsarAdmin.
> > > 2023-03-28T07:30:58,583+0000 [main] INFO
> > > org.apache.pulsar.common.sasl.JAASCredentialsContainer - successfully
> > > logged in.
> > > 2023-03-28T07:30:58,587+0000 [pulsar-tgt-refresh-thread] INFO
> > > org.apache.pulsar.common.sasl.TGTRefreshThread - TGT refresh thread
> > started.
> > > 2023-03-28T07:30:58,612+0000 [pulsar-tgt-refresh-thread] INFO
> > > org.apache.pulsar.common.sasl.TGTRefreshThread - Client principal is "
> > > pulsar-ad...@sn.io".
> > > 2023-03-28T07:30:58,613+0000 [pulsar-tgt-refresh-thread] INFO
> > > org.apache.pulsar.common.sasl.TGTRefreshThread - Server principal is
> > > "krbtgt/sn...@sn.io".
> > > 2023-03-28T07:30:58,617+0000 [pulsar-tgt-refresh-thread] INFO
> > > org.apache.pulsar.common.sasl.TGTRefreshThread - TGT valid starting at:
> > >     Tue Mar 28 07:30:58 UTC 2023
> > > 2023-03-28T07:30:58,617+0000 [pulsar-tgt-refresh-thread] INFO
> > > org.apache.pulsar.common.sasl.TGTRefreshThread - TGT expires:
> > >     Wed Mar 29 07:30:58 UTC 2023
> > > 2023-03-28T07:30:58,617+0000 [pulsar-tgt-refresh-thread] INFO
> > > org.apache.pulsar.common.sasl.TGTRefreshThread - TGT refresh sleeping
> > > until: Wed Mar 29 03:12:29 UTC 2023
> > > 2023-03-28T07:30:59,861+0000 [main] INFO
> > > org.apache.pulsar.client.impl.auth.PulsarSaslClient - Using
> > > JAAS/SASL/GSSAPI auth to connect to server Principal broker/pulsar03,
> > > HTTP 401 Unauthorized
> > > Reason: HTTP 401 Unauthorized
> > > ```
> > >
> > > And I want to cherry-pick https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/15121
> > into
> > > branch-2.10 to fix it.
> > >
> > > ### Background
> > > When using Kerberos for authentication, Pulsar works like this:
> > > - client: init ticket
> > > - request to broker
> > > - broker identifies the client (Broker can confirm the ticket is valid by
> > > Kerberos)
> > > - sends a token(we call it sasl_role_token) to the client ( at this
> > moment,
> > > the session is successfully created )
> > > - then the client will be authenticated through sasl_role_token, do not
> > use
> > > Kerberos anymore.
> > >
> > > The `sasl_role_token` is generated by this logic: `Sha512(saslRoleName,
> > > ${secret})`, we call the `secret` sasl_sign_secret.
> > > In version `2.10.x`, the variable `secret` is a random string initialized
> > > when the broker starts.
> > >
> > > ### Issue 1
> > > If a cluster includes two brokers, and a topic `public/default/tp1` is
> > > owned by broker-0. We will get an error when we call `pulsar-admin topics
> > > stats public/default/tp1` to broker-1.
> > >
> > > The whole process goes like this:
> > > - client succeeds in authentication and gets a token from broker-1
> > > - broker-1 tells the client to redirect to broker-0
> > > - client request to broker-0 carries the sasl_role_token generated by
> > > broker-1
> > > - broker-0 can not decode the sasl_role_token, because it has differ
> > secret
> > > of broker-1, and responses 401
> > >
> > > ### Issue 2
> > > After authentication is enabled for both Pulsar-Proxy and Pulsar-Broker,
> > > the error occurs as follows
> > > - client succeeds in authentication and gets a token from Pulsar Proxy
> > > - proxy forwards the request to broker
> > > - the broker can not decode the `sasl_role_token`, because it has
> > differed
> > > secret of Pulsar Proxy, and responses 401
> > >
> > > ### solutions
> > > There have two solutions to solve this issue:
> > >
> > > Solution 1
> > > - The client saves different tokens for different servers(e.g.
> > ["broker-0",
> > > "broker-1", "pulsar-proxy"]) so servers will receive the tokens issued by
> > > each other, then we can fix Issue 1.
> > > - Proxy and Broker do not enable authentication simultaneously, then we
> > can
> > > fix Issue 2.
> > >
> > > Solution 2
> > > - Make `sasl_sign_secret` configurable. Users can configure this variable
> > > to the same value, then multi servers can decode every
> > > `sasl_role_token.`  PR #15121 does this.
> > >
> > > I'd prefer Solution 2 because it is already in the master branch, so I
> > want
> > > to cherry-pick #15121 into branch-2.10.
> > >
> > > ### Forward Compatibility
> > > In PR #15121, the config `sasl_sign_secret` is a new item in config
> > files.
> > > Since it is required, users will get a system error if does not set it.
> > To
> > > ensure forward compatibility, we can make this variable optional in
> > > branch-2.10
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > Yubiao Feng
> > >
> >

Reply via email to