There is a discussion about the new API introduced in 3.0.0
but it should not be a public API.

Details to see: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/18950

Yunze is checking more details.

Regards,
Penghui

On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 7:02 PM Zike Yang <z...@apache.org> wrote:

> This is the second release candidate for Apache Pulsar, version 3.0.0.
>
> It fixes the following issues:
> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/milestone/34?closed=1
>
> *** Please download, test and verify on this release. This release
> candidate verification will stay open until April 25 ***
>
> Note that we are verifying upon the source (tag), binaries are provided for
> convenience.
>
> Source and binary files:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/pulsar/pulsar-3.0.0-candidate-2/
>
> SHA-512 checksums:
>
> 09d4c6ece070e4af3bee85f360936433067583699e768fb2a3c743e2e07ba31e9cfe7fa1151bde19a41fcbb107c8d18114ad938bda0d983dc72e94c12de7cb06
> apache-pulsar-3.0.0-bin.tar.gz
>
> ebb2d91aca806f3e19d9505d9b6dac4a61e8548ed1bb5b63c2be0116102b5ea6d51ad3c13ee9f79ac105b260934aec9e7a34294eca050ce8a26027d0d0fc996b
> apache-pulsar-3.0.0-src.tar.gz
>
> Maven staging repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachepulsar-1229/
>
> The tag to verify:
> v3.0.0-candidate-2 (7d72df306461da76cca2c895064abefcebb456ad)
> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/releases/tag/v3.0.0-candidate-2
>
> Pulsar's KEYS file containing PGP keys you use to sign the release:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/pulsar/KEYS
>
> Docker images:
>
> pulsar images:
> https://hub.docker.com/layers/9947090/pulsar/3.0.0/images/sha256-41175161ae2372a96fa17d3e9e9b991af569c65d7a98e0bce8fcef97358806a5?context=explore
>
> pulsar-all images:
>
> https://hub.docker.com/layers/9947090/pulsar-all/3.0.0/images/sha256-c2b846859d567220943ba3d320e9ea54650972aa880769cf6f9891e992984fd0?context=explore
>
> Please download the source package, and follow the README to build
> and run the Pulsar standalone service.
>
> Note that this RC doesn't require a formal vote, but we would also
> appreciate your feedback with +1/-1. And please provide specific
> comments if your feedback is not +1.
>
> Thanks,
> Zike Yang
>

Reply via email to