Micheal, Il giorno ven 9 giu 2023 alle ore 07:54 Michael Marshall <[email protected]> ha scritto: > > Hi Pulsar Community, > > I recently noticed this page on our website: > https://pulsar.apache.org/contribute/release-policy/#supported-versions > > It shows that only 2.11 and 3.0 are active and security support. > > I am guessing the timelines were taken from a strict reading of PIP > 47. However, we haven't historically followed the EOL timelines for > PIP 47 strictly, so I want to check here. > > For 2.8, I think we should declare it EOL or perform once last release.
I agree > > For 2.9, I think we could do the same as 2.8, but I am not sure if > that would surprise users. I am not sure, but as far as I know, 2.9 was kind of a transitional release, and I agree > > For 2.10, I think we should not consider it EOL. This is the latest release that runs on JDK11, we really cannot drop support for this. It would be worth declaring this LTS, as long as JDK11 is still widely used. This issue was discussed many times when we decided to move to JDK17 on 2.11. Cheers Enrico > > Let me know what you think. > > (Reminder: all feedback is welcome, especially from users!) > > Thanks! > Michael
