Il Lun 12 Giu 2023, 02:23 PengHui Li <peng...@apache.org> ha scritto:

> Do we need to have https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/3979
> in the 3.0.1 release? since it's a critical issue for BookKeeper.
>


Yes we do

Enrico

>
> Thanks,
> Penghui
>
> On Sun, Jun 11, 2023 at 12:07 AM Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I have reported a few problems about ExtensibleLoadManagerImpl (PIP-192)
> on
> > k8s.
> >
> > I would lile to see the related patches merged, this way it will be
> easier
> > for users to test this new feature.
> >
> >
> > BTW it is not a blocker.
> >
> > There are already enough fixes to motivate a release
> >
> >
> > +1
> >
> >
> > Enrico
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Il Sab 10 Giu 2023, 16:15 Christophe Bornet <bornet.ch...@gmail.com> ha
> > scritto:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > Le lun. 5 juin 2023 à 03:44, Zixuan Liu <node...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> > >
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Zixuan
> > > >
> > > > Hang Chen <chenh...@apache.org> 于2023年6月5日周一 09:39写道:
> > > > >
> > > > > +1
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Hang
> > > > >
> > > > > PengHui Li <peng...@apache.org> 于2023年6月5日周一 09:34写道:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > +1
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks for driving the release.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Penghui
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Thu, Jun 1, 2023 at 7:38 PM Zike Yang <z...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I would like to propose releasing the Pulsar 3.0.1.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Currently, there are 95 new commits in branch-3.0:
> > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/compare/v3.0.0...branch-3.0
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > And we have found that there is an issue with the
> > pulsar-all:3.0.0
> > > > > > > image:
> > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/phcrm6czhyo7po6qncojk46hkytswblj
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > We need to cut a new release. Please let me know if you have
> any
> > > > > > > important fixes that need to be included in Pulsar 3.0.1.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > Zike Yang
> > > > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to