The Pulsar BOM (PIP-326) implementation missed the initial timeline to be included in the 3.2.0 release.
It seems like an RC2 may be needed for a couple of new Bookkeeper bugs: * https://lists.apache.org/thread/tcy93c8vrb475j64tdotlklxblrcm728 * https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/21421 This thread is not to discuss the above bugs or if a 2nd RC is needed, but rather IFF a 2nd RC is decided upon would there be any objections to also include the Pulsar BOM (https://github.com/apache/pulsar/commit/176bdeacd309e8c1e49358987a1946abd30ba34a) in the RC2? This is an entirely additive change (new module not used by any other modules) and poses very low risk to the release. Any objections? Thanks, Chris
