Hi Dave, The meeting is being conducted in the same exact way as it was when you we’re participating in it.
-- Matteo Merli <matteo.me...@gmail.com> On Wed, Mar 6, 2024 at 6:43 AM Dave Fisher <w...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi - > > I see from the last meeting the following agenda: > > > 2024/02/29 > > Attendees: > > Lari Hotari > > Jonas > > Kevin Lu > > Frank Kelly > > Asaf Mesika > > Chris Bono > > David Jensen > > > > Agenda > > PIP-341: Pluggable client metrics tracker interface > > 1. Should the OTel implementation be included in the PIP, or as a > separate follow-up PIP? > > 2. Do we want to maintain compatibility with the existing stats system > (ex. the public Producer /Consumer’s getStats() API), or keep the tracker > interface completely separate (and deprecate the old system)? The current > PIP attempts to maintain full compatibility, but I have detailed some of > the challenges/solutions for maintaining compatibility with the old system. > > Here is the draft https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/22145 < > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/22145> > > Trivy container scan PR (https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/22063 < > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/22063>) > > Pulsar-manager > > Release notes / Upgrade notes . Making it easier to upgrade to newer > Pulsar versions > > Cherry-pick vs cascade branch merge > > I do not recall that any of this discussion made it to the mailing list. > It looks like decisions are being made in the meeting. > > For example: > 1. Is there anything in the PIP-341 discussion that could not have been > brought to the mailing list in a [DISCUSS] PIP-341 thread? > The only thing I can find on a mailing list is this thread. > https://lists.apache.org/thread/nott6fyo2vylv1d7nq3zwhsojm05fkgr < > https://lists.apache.org/thread/nott6fyo2vylv1d7nq3zwhsojm05fkgr> > 2, Trivy - I don’t see it brought back: > https://lists.apache.org/list?*@pulsar.apache.org:dfr=2024-1-1|dto=2024-3-6:Trivy > < > https://lists.apache.org/list?*@pulsar.apache.org:dfr=2024-1-1%7Cdto=2024-3-6:Trivy > > > 3. Pulsar Manager - Nothing brought back to the mailing list: > https://lists.apache.org/list?dev@pulsar.apache.org:dfr=2024-1-1|dto=2024-3-6:pulsar%20manager > <https://lists.apache.org/list?dev@pulsar.apache.org:dfr=2024-1-1%7Cdto=2024-3-6:pulsar%20manager> > < > https://lists.apache.org/list?dev@pulsar.apache.org:dfr=2024-1-1%7Cdto=2024-3-6:pulsar%20manager > > > 4. Cherry pick question came back as this wall of text: > https://lists.apache.org/thread/j6qvt45rndnvjypcmqxsfmddqt41bxjv < > https://lists.apache.org/thread/j6qvt45rndnvjypcmqxsfmddqt41bxjv> > > I can see how this can look to an outsider like decisions are being made > in a non-open manner in a synchronous meeting. > > If you wish to continue with this meeting then please publish the agenda > in advance to the Mailing List! > > Best, > Dave > >
