Hi, This PIP allows system admin to skip any failures regardless of schema loss to avoid impact on business critical topics where availability is higher priority than schema. This PIP was created 4 months back and the same question was answered in the PIP discussion thread and PR as well.
Thanks, Rajan On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 6:52 PM SiNan Liu <[email protected]> wrote: > Please go here first to discuss the solution after the schema is lost. We > have some conflicts on the solution. (It is only related to the schema part > of this PIP) > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/zbkpypb1yw89op510f7zg7cdkns1om0q > > > Thanks, > sinan > > > Apurva Telang <[email protected]>于2024年4月17日 周三02:43写道： > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 10:11 AM Enrico Olivelli <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > Enrico > > > > > > Il Mar 16 Apr 2024, 19:08 Rajan Dhabalia <[email protected]> ha > > > scritto: > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I would like to start voting thread for PIP-327 which also addresses > > > issue > > > > # https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/21751 > > > > > > > > PIP design PR: > > > > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/21752 > > > > <https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/21452> > > > > > > > > Thread: > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/w7w91xztdyy07otw0dh71nl2rn3yy45p > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Rajan > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Best regards, > > Apurva Telang. > > >
