+1

In the future, I think we should maintain the client LTS version page here:
https://pulsar.apache.org/docs/next/client-libraries/

The original page is so hard to find that I guess users won't find it
easily: https://pulsar.apache.org/contribute/release-policy/

Thanks,
Baodi Shi


On Apr 25, 2024 at 01:40:30, Matteo Merli <mme...@apache.org> wrote:

> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/22578
>
> ---
>
>
> # PIP-347: Extend LTS release process to client SDKs
>
> ## Motivation
>
> PIP-175 [1] has introduced the concept of LTS releases in Pulsar, with a
> defined cadence of feature and LTS release and setting a clear expectation
> in terms of support window for each release.
>
> The first Pulsar LTS release to follow this model was 3.0 in April 2023
> and it will be followed by 4.0 release in October 2024.
>
> Users have been very appreciative of these models and it has simplified the
> work of maintainers, now that there are less active versions to support.
>
> While for the Pulsar Java client SDK, we are implicitly adopting the LTS
> model, that
> is not true for any other Pulsar client SDK, officially supported by the
> Pulsar
> PMC.
>
> This leaves all the non-Java client SDKs with different release cadences,
> versioning and there is no support policy stated.
>
>
> ## Goal
>
> The goal of this proposal is to align the support window for non-Java
> client
> SDKs to the same LTS model introduced in PIP-175.
>
> The interested clients are:
> * C++ https://github.com/apache/pulsar-client-cpp
> * Python https://github.com/apache/pulsar-client-python
> * Go https://github.com/apache/pulsar-client-go
> * NodeJS https://github.com/apache/pulsar-client-node
> * .NET https://github.com/apache/pulsar-dotpulsar
> * Reactive https://github.com/apache/pulsar-client-reactive
>
> All the above client libraries should switch to the 4.0 version now, to
> mark the
> first LTS release, then they will do 5.0 18 months after.
>
> Users of these client SDK should be expecting bug fixes for 24 months and
> security for 36 months on the LTS release branches.
>
> This will set a clear expectation for users when deciding on a Pulsar SDK
> version to use.
>
>
> ## Changes
>
> All non-Java client SDKs managed by Pulsar PMC, will be starting to follow
> the
> same LTS release cadence established by Pulsar server releases.
>
> The alignment will be done only in terms of LTS releases. Feature releases
> will
> be done independently, with no requirement for quarterly feature releases.
> Each
> client SDK maintainer team (even though there is no formal team, there is
> typically a smaller group of committers/PMCs closely following each
> language SDK)
> will do feature and patch releases as needed.
>
> The only new requirement will be to perform LTS releases every 18 months.
>
> There will be no additional requirement or additional explicit support
> window
> for client SDKs feature releases.
>
>
> ## Note
>
> Similarly as for Pulsar server LTS releases, the major version digit bump
> does
> not signify any breaking changes and does not necessarily imply any "big"
> new
> features are introduced in a release.
>
> The compatibility between client and brokers running in different major
> versions
> will always be guaranteed, when using the lowest common denominator of
> supported features.
>
>
> ---
>
> [1]: PIP-175 https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/15966
>
>
> --
> Matteo Merli
> <mme...@apache.org>
>

Reply via email to