Thanks, everyone.

Close this vote with 3 binding +1s:
- Dave Fisher
- Enrico Olivelli
- Yunze Xu

Thanks,
Xiangying


On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 4:01 PM Yunze Xu <x...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Well, let me change my binding -1 to binding +1.
>
> Thanks,
> Yunze
>
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 3:22 PM steven lu <lushiji2...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > In the past period of time, we have initiated several discussions with
> > other companies and Pulsar community developers, and improved the project
> > as follows:
> >
> > As you can see, there are one license [1], one SECURITY file [2], CI
> > workflows[3], and more commits in the last two weeks [4].
> > there are one best practice part[5] and execution plan [6].
> >
> > Secondly, maintaining this repo requires Pulsar PMC's care. now there are
> > two PMC members who support to maintain it. [7]
> >
> >
> > [1] license file:
> > https://github.com/StevenLuMT/pulsar-java-contrib?tab=License-1-ov-file
> > [2] SECURITY file:
> > https://github.com/StevenLuMT/pulsar-java-contrib?tab=security-ov-file
> > [3] CI workflows:
> > https://github.com/StevenLuMT/pulsar-java-contrib/pull/8/checks
> > [4] commits in the last two weeks:
> > https://github.com/StevenLuMT/pulsar-java-contrib/commits/stable/
> > [5] best practice:
> > https://github.com/StevenLuMT/pulsar-java-contrib/tree/stable/pulsar-client-common-contrib/src/main/java/org/apache/pulsar/client/api/impl
> > [6] execution plan:
> > https://github.com/StevenLuMT/pulsar-java-contrib/issues/7
> > [7] VOTE for PIP-367:
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread/td0j8l1c3l93nny0m5smnsdmb91j1n2y
> >
> > On Sat, Aug 3, 2024 at 5:25 PM xiangying meng <xiangy...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all, I want to start a vote on PIP-367: Propose a Contributor
> > > Repository for Pulsar
> > >
> > > You can find the proposal at https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/23061
> > > and
> > > the discussion thread at
> > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/75y70j6pqw15271b0tq8j637tb02mrwo
> > >
> > > The vote will stay open for at least 48 hours.
> > >
> > > BR,
> > > Xiangying
> > >

Reply via email to