Hi Zixuan
Regarding the comments you left > This pip attempts to bypass schema checks and also performs unnecessary > policy checks. The following comments answer your two arguments one by one. --- Regarding the first argument: attempts to bypass schema checks, you left the following comment > -1, I don't suggest we ignore the replicator check. Once the schema is > incompatible, we should disconnect the replicator. What I wrote in the proposal is "always allow the replicator to register a new schema if compatible"; it seems that you did not read the doc carefully --- Regarding the second argument: performs unnecessary policy checks, you left the following comment > If you want to replicate __change_events, please make sure the topic type is > the same between the source and remote clusters. The replication of `__change_events` is defined by PIP-92(https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/13444), the current proposal only keeps the previous behavior. You can submit a separate discussion to argue whether PIP-92 is needed --- Thanks Yubiao Feng
