Hi Cor,
You careful reply is very much appreciated.

Cor Nouws wrote:
Hi Mike,

Mike Hall wrote:

Having said I wouldn't write anything, I've been prompted to do so by further comments from users. A draft document seeking to convince the community that more needs to be done on basic functionality is at www.onepoyle.net/ooo/doc/ooo_minimum_functionality.odt

Thanks for sending this. However. I'm not sure if it is fair, or if it was meant, that you do it in this way..
Yes, I guessed that, but I needed to start somewhere.
As you have read before on this list, the process ...
So maybe more appropriate is a poll/discussion on [email protected] on most needed, missed features. And done in plain text e-mail.
But be aware: buy you some extra band-with ;-)
OK,  thanks, I understand that and I will try it when time allows.
- If it does, where would it be best to place to verify it and, possibly different, the best place to put it to influence senior OOo decision makers and developers?

With the results of that, you can go to the already mentioned lists and issuezila. And then you have various way to raise interest for the items. And because of the development process (what is where all should end) a seperate issue for each item is needed ... It is a long road, but I do not see a better one. (Unless you can find way's to hire developers to include 'your' wishes.)
I understand the overall process that individual issues are needed and why (though in many cases I bet they are there already and it's priority we'll be talking about). However, I'm also seeking to influence the setting of priorities so that some of the little boring things are fixed quicker. It's easy to find examples in current issues where the effort in discussing what to do, even by the developer, exceeds the effort to fix the bug.

In respect of the examples I gave, I was more concerned about the principles than the specifics, however in order to demonstrate why I thought they were important, I will defend them just this once...
Some comments on your list:
- Text colour in Writer: can't hardly imagine that it is a serious issue, really affecting peoples work;
This one originally arose from the chairman of a prominent local organisation I'm seeking to influence to adopt OOo. She was endeavouring to redesign headed notepaper and hit the problem of not being able to work with an out-of-palette colour. So, I got asked about it. For her it was a serious issue, as it would be for any basic user needing to work out-of-palette because, even if you know where to go to add colours, you can't add your own within Writer unless you can find out its colour components.
- Hyperlink: cursor in the text and pressing Ctrl-Shft-Space (or Format|Default) removes the Hyperlink. A matter of knowing how OOo works;
OK, thanks, I should have known as I've been working with styles for years. I also expect to work out how an application works. However, is it reasonable to argue that the comment 'it's a matter of knowing how OOo works' makes my point? I would never dare to say that to a basic user (though I would show them what to do) because the response would reasonably be 'I shouldn't need to know how OOo works if it's designed properly'. I spent a long time - well over an hour - working on this after yet another user encountered the problem. Even a Google search didn't come up with your solution, but it did illustrate how many people were getting frustrated by hyperlinks in Writer.
- Spaces with dragging: I nearly always work with the key board, however can imagine that it is annoying for people using the mouse.
I'm thinking of asking people to nominate just one issue. This might be mine!

--

Mike Hall
www.onepoyle.net

Reply via email to