Hi *, On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 07:58:06PM +1000, Alex Fisher wrote: > On Monday 04 September 2006 17:59, Ambrogio wrote: > > Il giorno lun, 04/09/2006 alle 07.53 +1000, Alex Fisher ha scritto: > > > If this helps (Ill add it to the issue if required)... Not sure if it > [...] > Well, with just the "soffice" command given, I get > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ ps aux |grep "soffice" > alex 8076 0.0 0.1 3884 1496 pts/0 S+ 19:45 > 0:00 /bin/sh /usr/bin/soffice > alex 8093 1.5 4.1 138312 43056 pts/0 Sl+ 19:45 > 0:03 /etc/openoffice.org-2.0/program/soffice.bin > alex 8161 0.0 0.0 2968 748 pts/1 S+ 19:48 0:00 grep soffice > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ > > Somewhat less than with a 15k spreadsheet loaded (as in the previous message).
Comparing the process of soffice alone doesn't tell much. You only should compare with soffice + empty spreadsheet open. > > So I think it's normal. > > After loading the spreadsheet, I get > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ ps aux |grep "soffice" > alex 8076 0.0 0.1 3884 1496 pts/0 S+ 19:45 > 0:00 /bin/sh /usr/bin/soffice > alex 8093 1.7 7.0 181792 73212 pts/0 Sl+ 19:45 > 0:06 /etc/openoffice.org-2.0/program/soffice.bin > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ > > Seems a difference of around 50k, which to me seems a little big for such a > small document. Remember: OOo's documents are zipped. So I don't see why that should be "to big" for a 15k spreadsheet. You can assume twice the size for the mere data. And then OOo has to interpret the data, etc. And probably it had to load the file-open dialog as well... > If I now load a 17 kB text document, I now get > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ ps aux |grep "soffice" > alex 8076 0.0 0.1 3884 1496 pts/0 S+ 19:45 > 0:00 /bin/sh /usr/bin/soffice > alex 8093 1.6 8.2 213088 84968 pts/0 Sl+ 19:45 > 0:09 /etc/openoffice.org-2.0/program/soffice.bin > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ And what should that tell? This tells nothing again. Since maybe it needs to load a couple of fonts, etc. Not to meantion the writer-only components (since the one shared with calc are already loaded)... > Probably best to set it confirmed, I think. There does seem to be quite a lot > of memory used. But, I am not a developer, so it could be quite normal. The > above examples are probably the best I can do. I'll leave it to others to > decide if this looks normal or not. What memory do you think is used here? Remember that ps shows all stuff used by other processes for every program. > > What do you think? I cannot see any "extraordinary" memory usage here. ciao Christian -- NP: Helloween - Keeper Of The Seven Keys --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
