Andrea: I need to get to QATracker. I am the Mac OS X release authority for American English.
James McKenzie -----Original Message----- >From: Andrea Pescetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Dec 3, 2006 3:52 PM >To: [email protected] >Subject: Re: [qa-dev] QAtrack and > >Vito Smolej wrote: >> what's the mechanism - if theres one - between the qatrack and TCM >> (which I suppose is the testing environment, at least it's the one I >> know of and where I do my digging) ? Or is it just the qa person, >> ticking off his or her checkboxes? > >Qatrack and TCM are separated systems: TCM is used for testing, Qatrack >is used for release approvals. There is no interaction at the moment. > >In general, there could be some interaction between Qatrack and TCM (and >IZ) but the different authentication systems make it harder. There are, >however, plans to implement some communication in Qatrack (links to TCM >reports, links to IZ). > >> In the list in qatrack.org/ooo there's quite a lot of entries with >> untested status and no person responsible for qa (quality absence;?) . > >The large number of untested builds is due to the tool being new. Just a >few QA leads decided to request access for OOo 2.0.4. We are seeing some >more for OOo 2.1, and more will gradually follow. > >So if a build is marked as UNTESTED this doesn't mean that it has not >been tested at all; maybe it has, but the relevant NL project is not >using Qatrack yet. >Regards, > Andrea Pescetti. > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
