On 01/07/2008, at 6:59 PM, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote:
Le Mardi 1 Juillet 2008 11:15, Clytie Siddall a écrit :On 01/07/2008, at 6:21 AM, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote:Hi all,I think issue 91019 should be considered as a stopper for next beta 2Jean-Baptiste, this issue has been marked as a duplicate of issue 90878, which says the problem has been fixed in cws rptfix01.Yes I see but I sent my mail a day before the issue has been marked as duplicate :)You can track the progress of that CWS on EIS [1]. You can subscribe to an RSS feed for each CWS.Yes I know that.EIS says that CWS was integrated in DEV300_m20, which was uploaded a while ago.Are you sure ? there is nothing in the column milestone (integrated).You can check the fix in that build. :)The bug is still present in Dev300_m21 :( So my suggestion for 91019 should be considered for #90878.
My mistake (yet another non-intuitive OpenOffice.org interface ;) ). I saw "Milestone - Integrated" and the milestone number next to it, and assumed that meant it had been integrated into that milestone. Apparently it doesn't.
I'm not sure what it means, but if the "Milestone (integrated)" column is the one that actually means the CWS has been integrated (and not the "Milestone" column with the status "Integrated"), then the "integration date" is 2007-07-01, which will still be in time for OpenOffice.org 3.0.
from Clytie Vietnamese Free Software Translation Team http://vnoss.net/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=projects:l10n
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
