Hi Thorsten, Thanks for the explaination.
So it seems OOH680_mX is a Code base name, and OOo2.4 is a Version Name. Is that right? But in the issuetrack, the version field contents both of the names. So I think, actually, they are equally used in our work. Is that so? BTW, I'll participate in the orgnization of the IRC meet. Please let me know when you decide to start a meeting, maybe I need some preparation on it. I have no much experience in IRC. But I think after 1 or 2 meetings, we could do better. I've registered as "redflagzhulihua" in #qa.openoffice.org. Best regards, Lihua 2008-07-09 发件人： Thorsten Ziehm 发送时间： 2008-07-08 15:55:49 收件人： [email protected] 抄送： 主题： Re: [qa-dev] About OOo Version Hi Lihua, OOA680 = 1. Update for OOo 2.0 OOB680 = 2. Update for OOo 2.0 In European languages it is common to use the alphabet to describe a numbering. A = 1. B = 2. .... In between the release cycle of OOo 2.x it was changed that OOo was released as Feature release (e.g. 2.3) or only Bugfix release (e.g. 2.3.1). The bugfix releases are on the same code base like the corresponding feature release. ---- OOo 2.3.1 (OOG...)---| --- OOo 2.4.1 (OOH...) -- / / - OOo 2.3 -|--------------------- OOo 2.4 ---| But now there will not be any development on OOo 2.x code base anymore. When security fixes or major bug fixes are needed, there will be a OOo 2.4.2, which will base on the code line of OOo 2.4.1. So the fixes will be done on OOH680_mX. So there isn't a plan for 2.5, 2.6 or any other feature releases on 2.x. The limitation of the naming of the code base is 3 characters (OO?) and 3 numbers (680). The naming BEA if for 1. Beta (BE = Beta, A = 1.). So the naming BEB is for the 2. Beta (BE = Beta, B = 2). I do not know the naming for the 3.0 final, but it will be like OOA300 or something like that. Thorsten Zhu Lihua wrote: > Hi all, > > I know OOo2.2 is corresponding to OOF680_mX, OOo2.3 is corresponding to > OOG680_mX, OOo2.4 is corresponding to OOH680_mX. > > What's the name of "OOF680_mX, OOG680_mX, ..."? Version? I think OOo2.X are > more like a Version. OOo2.X and OOX680_mX must > have different names. What are they? > > For the OOo3.0, I knew DEV300_mX is corresponding with OOo3.X. But now I've > noticed that BEA300 and BEB300 appeared. What's > the relationship between DEV and BEA? > > Thank you! > > > Best regards, > Lihua > > > > > 2008-07-08 > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
