On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 4:44 PM, Maho NAKATA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: "Nguyen Vu Hung" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=95043 >> Any ideas? >> Testdata( testtool) failure or 3.0 RC4 win32intel vi corruption? > Helge told me about this.
Thanks for your confirmation. I will ignore ch2_lvl1_wizard.res test results this time. The reason is that the test data proved in qatesttool_HEAD.tgz as of 2008/10/16 is not "suitable" for 3.0.0rc4 vi. I also updated vi's team issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=95043 for the following files: OOo_3.0.0rc4_20080930_Win32Intel_install_vi.exe OOo_3.0.0rc4_20080930_LinuxIntel_install_vi.tar.gz However, I will use "cvs checkout -r OOO300_m9 testautomation" in the next tests against OOo_3.0.0rc4_20080930_LinuxIntel_install_wJRE_vi.tar.gz OOo_3.0.0rc4_20080930_Win32Intel_install_wJRE_vi.exe > > From: Helge Delfs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [qa-dev] Re: [Issue 94139] [QA] QA status of JA 3.0 build > Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 10:12:30 +0200 > >> Hi Maho, >> >> Am 11.10.08 01:14, Maho NAKATA schrieb: >> > For VCLTestTool environment, I'm using Andre's checkout and now >> > environment we must use match with the milestone we want to test. >> >> Latest checkout provided by Andre imho is not suitable to test OOO300 >> Builds. >> Module testautomation must be used to test current builds >> >> > How can we go? Andre, I think you should checkout by milestone >> > not head or specific tag. >> >> cvs checkout -r OOO300_m9 testautomation (f.e. RC4 testscripts) >> >> >> >> Best Regards >> Helge >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > -- Nakata Maho http://accc.riken.jp/maho/ > > -- Best Regards, Nguyen Hung Vu ( Nguyễn Vũ Hưng ) [EMAIL PROTECTED] , YIM: vuhung16 , Skype: vuhung16dg A brief profile: http://www.hn.is.uec.ac.jp/~vuhung/Nguyen.Vu.Hung.html
