Hi *, 2009/10/9 Reizinger Zoltán <[email protected]>: > Hi All, > I not has a clear picture of keyword usage in issue tracker. > If I see into: http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/describekeywords.cgi, I find > lot of keywords which I not find in present list of issues, only regression, > crash, release_blocker and oooqa, or on most of cases nothing. > If I read this: > oooqa - This keyword should be used to make clear that an OOo QA volunteer > has applied a change to an issue, be it an additional description, a > priority change or anything else. [...] > Another question oooqa keyword has any usage?
It /should/ reflect the following: This issue a) is complete, doesn't need any more info from the reporter, can be handled by developers or b) doesn't have enough info to be handled, needs more info. In that case, also the needmoreinfo keyword should be set. So when you're trying to help reduce the workload on QA-Devs and Volunteers, then don't bother with issues that already have the oooqa keyword set. Skip to those with no keyword. > I as qa volunteer how can/shold use oooqa keyword? You should use it. It signals: "This issue already has been gone through a first review" - either with the restult that the description is clrearly understandable, that all required sample documents are available, that the subject is telling, that the other flags are set properly. And: You should have checked for duplicates (often this is forgotten, and I blame myself here as well) Sum-up: Any issue with oooqa (and no needmoreinfo) keyword should meet the minimum requirements of an issue. This is at least my interpretation of the keyword. ciao Christian --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
