I think this is important. I am still trying to get around to installing 10.4 on a separate partition purely for testing OOo. The differences between the three OS's listed in the OP are fairly significant for developers, and the ways in which their software interacts with the system. Bugs and builds one one can turn out completely different on another. It seems mac issue reporters usually post the exact version of the OS they're running but this proposal will make sure.
It raises the question however, how does someone confirming issues mark an issue known to occur on more than one of these versions of MacOS X? iPhone of Gallo On 2009-11-13, at 0:02, Uwe Altmann <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi > in issuetracker, there is a "Platform" field which can be "Macintosh" > and an "OS" field where "Mac OS X" is the only choice so far for Macs. > Both mean basically the same because there has never been a OS 8 or 9 > version of OOo and StarOffice for Mac also is long gone history. > > Instead, I would like to see "Mac OS 10.4", "Mac OS 10.5" and "Mac OS > 10.6" replacing "OS X" because this would give some sometimes needed > information; a "Macintosh PPC" vs. "Macintosh Intel" in Platform also > would be nice but because of PPC is an endangered species perhaps not > worth the work. > > What do you thing about that? > -- > Mit freundlichen Grüßen > > Uwe Altmann > > OpenOffice.org auf dem Mac: > http://porting.openoffice.org/mac/ > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
