Hi Marcus, and Joost I see. Thanks, in any case I recommend filing issue. Otherwise we cannot keep track what happens, even though it is *NOT* actually trigger the real processes.
So - Marcus, what is your opinion for approval issues? Is it relevant? Is it redundant? cf. http://blog.livedoor.jp/maho_nakata/archives/51348609.html In my opinion, keeping two identical info are problematic. Thanks, From: Marcus Lange <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [qa-dev] Testing 3.2.0 en-US on MacOS X PPC Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 10:28:59 +0100 > Hi Maho, > > I wrote no specific issue for this. But the distribution is tracked in > QATrack. > > Ciao > > Marcus > > > > Maho NAKATA wrote: >> Hi Marcus, and Jean-Baptiste >> thank you very much, I'm very appreciated! >> Anyway which issue is related to this release process? >> Thanks again! >> From: Marcus Lange <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [qa-dev] Testing 3.2.0 en-US on MacOS X PPC >> Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 10:00:18 +0100 >> >>> Hi Maho, >>> >>> yes, in my previous post of course I mean "now available". ;-) >>> >>> Best regards >>> >>> Marcus >>> >>> >>> >>> Maho NAKATA wrote: >>>> Hi >>>> I guess you mean >>>> http://ooopackages.good-day.net/pub/OpenOffice.org/MacOSX/3.2.0rc5_20100202/OOo_3.2.0rc5_20100202_MacOSXPowerPC_install.dmg >>>> ? >>>> From: Marcus Lange <[email protected]> >>>> Subject: Re: [qa-dev] Testing 3.2.0 en-US on MacOS X PPC >>>> Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 13:42:37 +0100 >>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> the build is no available for download on the websites. >>>>> >>>>> Best regards >>>>> >>>>> Marcus >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Maho NAKATA wrote: >>>>>> Hello Jean-Baptiste >>>>>> many thanks as PowerPC package provider. how you will have >>>>>> done should be formalized so that others can take over. >>>>>> thanks >>>>>> From: Jean-Baptiste Faure <[email protected]> >>>>>> Subject: Re: [qa-dev] Testing 3.2.0 en-US on MacOS X PPC >>>>>> Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 21:37:05 +0100 >>>>>> >>>>>>> Le 10.03.2010 09:43, Marcus Lange a écrit : >>>>>>>> Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote: >>>>>>>>> Le 09.03.2010 23:07, Marcus Lange a écrit : >>>>>>>>>> Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote: >>>>>>>> Hi Jean-Baptiste, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Ok, I have added a second tests scenario for MacOS PPC to papayes >>>>>>>>>>>> in FR >>>>>>>>>>>> category. He will read test description in French and do the tests >>>>>>>>>>>> on >>>>>>>>>>>> en_US version. >>>>>>>>>>> Tests (Release Sanity scenario) done (assignment ID : 8385). One >>>>>>>>>>> Fail >>>>>>>>>>> found as in FR version, on test 109172. >>>>>>>>>> so, in other words the test was successful and the build is >>>>>>>>>> approved? >>>>>>>>> If it was FR build I would want a second test to confirm. But if you >>>>>>>>> do >>>>>>>>> not have a second tester I think you can consider that other approved >>>>>>>>> PPC builds help to approve this one. >>>>>>>> then I think a single test must be enough. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> So, thanks a lot for your help and of course to the tester. :-) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Best regards >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Marcus >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> You're welcome :-) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> JBF > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
