Woohoo. Thanks all! On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 4:29 PM, Paul Hammant <[email protected]> wrote:
> Release has gone out. Still updating bugs, and site/javadoc yet to make > good. > > -ph > > > On May 4, 2009, at 2:09 PM, Paul Hammant wrote: > > Nae probs, I'll make sure its right too. > Regards, > > - Paul > > On May 4, 2009, at 11:21 AM, Robert Scholte wrote: > > Having breakfast with qdox-1.9.1, sounds great :) > > Paul, won't you forget to update the javadoc for the site as well? Now it's > based on 1.8-SNAPSHOT, and 1.9 had some modelchanges (introduction of > JavaPackage) so it's time for a more recent version :) > > cheers, > > Robert > > ------------------------------ > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 11:08:18 -0700 > Subject: Re: [qdox-dev] request for next qdox release > > OK, I'll do it in about 8 hours :) > We're pushing out 1.9.1 right ? > > Regards, > > - Paul > > On May 4, 2009, at 9:44 AM, Robert Scholte wrote: > > Dennis' option sounds like the perfect solution to our problem. > Let me return the already reversioned issues back to 1.10, so somebody else > (Mauro?) could delete 1.9.1 and rename the 1.10. > > It seems pretty hard to meet each other on IRC due to the spread of our > timezones. I'll get my experience sooner or later, so let's just deploy the > next qdox with or without me. > > regards > > -Robert > > > > Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 18:30:26 +0200 > > From: [email protected] > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [qdox-dev] request for next qdox release > > > > Another way to do it is to simply rename the version 1.10 to 1.9.1 in > > JIRA. That works well if all the issues should be moved, as is the case > > here. > > > > Robert Scholte wrote: > > > http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa > > > project: Qdox > > > Issue Type: Any > > > Fix For: 1.10 > > > > > > and you'll get 13 issues: > > > in the upper right corner: Bulk change all 13 issue(s) > > > > > > then check them all, followed by Edit Issues, which is not available > for me > > > > > > - Robert > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > From: [email protected] > > > To: [email protected] > > > Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 07:49:16 -0700 > > > Subject: Re: [qdox-dev] request for next qdox release > > > > > > OK, someone give me the skinny : move which issues en-masse to which > > > version number. > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > - Paul > > > > > > On Apr 25, 2009, at 7:32 AM, Robert Scholte wrote: > > > > > > I've done it with one of my own introduced tasks, but it just didn't > > > felt right. So I had a look on jira-documentation and I think > > > there's a better way to change it: bulk operations > > > > http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira/docs/latest/bulkoperations.html#Steps+to+Perform+Bulk+Operations > > > One issue: you need to have enough permissions to be able to change > > > these issues. (and you guessed right: I don't have them) > > > It looks quite easy (and fast! :) ) so could one of you try to > > > change the fixed version this way? > > > > > > regards > > > > > > - Robert > > > > > > > > > > To: [email protected] > > > > <mailto:[email protected]<[email protected]> > > > > > > From: [email protected] > > > > <mailto:[email protected]<[email protected]> > > > > > > Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 13:58:35 +0100 > > > > Subject: Re: [qdox-dev] request for next qdox release > > > > > > > > Robert Scholte wrote: > > > > > Hi Mauro, > > > > > > > > > > thanks for your action. And yes, it would be nice if you could > > > move the > > > > > issues to 1.9.1 > > > > > > > > Actually, I was mistaken. I thought I could do a move, but that > > > applies > > > > only to inter-project moves. In our case, we need to edit the issues > > > > > one by one and change the fix version to 1.9.1. > > > > > > > > As they are assigned to you and would have to re-assign them to edit > > > > > them and then re-assign them to you (credit where credit due!), > > > perhaps > > > > easier if you do it. > > > > > > > > > About the 1.9.2 or 1.10, I don't have the experience yet to know > > > what > > > > > works best. > > > > > From my point of view it looks easier if you go to 1.9.2 and while > > > > > > you're working on issues can decide if it's better to release > > > > > a non-minor, pushing it to 1.10 instead of the other way around > > > (going > > > > > back from 1.10 to 1.9.2) > > > > > It's minor thing, so let's go for the 1.10 > > > > > > > > If we know already we're doing a 1.9.2 and not a 1.10 then it does > > > make > > > > sense to have a 1.9.2-SNAPSHOT and assign issues to 1.9.2 in Jira. > > > > > > > > > > > > If we have yet decided, then let's keep 1.10. > > > > > > > > I'm fine either way. > > > > > > > > Cheers > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: > > > > > > > > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! MSN Messenger > > > <http://clk.atdmt.com/AVE/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/> > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > See all the ways you can stay connected to friends and family > > > <http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windowslive/default.aspx> > > > > > > -- > > Dennis Lundberg > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: > > > > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email > > > > > > ------------------------------ > What can you do with the new Windows Live? Find > out<http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windowslive/default.aspx> > > > > ------------------------------ > Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! MSN > Messenger<http://clk.atdmt.com/AVE/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/> > > > >
