[
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/QDOX-226?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=277736#comment-277736
]
Robert Scholte commented on QDOX-226:
-------------------------------------
Already making some good progress.
>From [rev. 1306|http://fisheye.codehaus.org/changelog/qdox/?cs=1306] untill
>[rev. 1311|http://fisheye.codehaus.org/changelog/qdox/?cs=1311]
Now the JavaField and JavaClass have some extra methods and the parsing of the
EnumConstants has been changed. Still have to change the parsing of the
arguments and then we can start modelling.
> Enum constructors are parsed to fields
> --------------------------------------
>
> Key: QDOX-226
> URL: https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/QDOX-226
> Project: QDox
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Parser
> Affects Versions: 1.12
> Reporter: Robert Scholte
> Assignee: Robert Scholte
>
> {{parser.y}} contains the following:
> {noformat}
> enum_constructor:
> IDENTIFIER { makeField(new TypeDef($1, 0), ""); } |
> IDENTIFIER CODEBLOCK { makeField(new TypeDef($1, 0), ""); } |
> IDENTIFIER PARENBLOCK { makeField(new TypeDef($1, 0), ""); } |
> IDENTIFIER PARENBLOCK CODEBLOCK { makeField(new TypeDef($1, 0), ""); };
> {noformat}
> This just can't be right, since fields and constructors are two completely
> different things.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
