All,

Before we get too much further into M5, I think it might be good to have a
phone conversation about the points on the M4 release review.

It could potentially let us have a nice quick discussion about the plans
Martin has proposed for M5, without too many 10s of postings to multiple
threads.

Has everyone listed their items on the page Aidan created ? We could then
discuss and make some proposals around these areas for M5. Obviously, we'll
note and share on-list for feedback too.

http://qpid.apache.org/m4-release-process-notes.html

Regards,
Marnie

On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 9:25 AM, Aidan Skinner <ai...@apache.org> wrote:

> On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 2:25 AM, Rajith Attapattu <rajit...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Agree that Qpid as a project needs to pay more attention to licensing
> > issues.
> > I had to update a ton of files for the ASF header across all languages
> and
> > it wasn't fun at all :)
> > The addition of a GPL library was a honest mistake and should have been
> > caught during the review process.
>
> That's the thing I'm concerned about. Licensing Is Hard(tm), but we
> should really have caught this earlier than we did. Fortunately there
> was an obvious ASL-licensed drop-in replacement. Ripping out libs
> while rolling release candidates is not something I want to make a
> habit of though.
>
> If our review process didn't catch this, we need another way of
> managing dependency changes.
>
> It was ok this time, and I don't want to get into a finger pointing
> exercise. I just want to make sure that next time we don't roll a
> release which depends on GNU Frobnicator and there isn't an obvious
> replacement. That stuff seriously damages the hairline.
>
> > The Java patch review has IMO improved compared to previous iterations. I
> > got very good feedback for most of my patches.
> > However I agree that certain areas had large code drops without much
> review,
> > even when patches were posted and emails sent requesting review.
>
> It wasn't just large code drops, there were a number of commits which
> had their associated Jira either left Open or went straight to
> resolved, totally bypassing the process.
>
> - Aidan
> --
> Apache Qpid - World Domination through Advanced Message Queueing
> http://qpid.apache.org
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
> Project:      http://qpid.apache.org
> Use/Interact: mailto:dev-subscr...@qpid.apache.org
>
>

Reply via email to