2009/3/11 Steve Huston <[email protected]>:
> Hi Martin,
>
> FYI, part of the work Microsoft is funding me to do is produce a
> prebuilt binary installer for M5. Where it will be offered from is not
> yet determined, but it can always be from riverace.com.
>
> -Steve

Steve, That's great. What will the installer contain? Only Broker,
Broker+Client or two installers one for each?

Cheers

>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [email protected]
>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Martin Ritchie
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2009 7:07 AM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [Discussion] Release Artefacts
>>
>>
>> Thanks for everyone's input on this:
>>
>> Seems like we are all agreeing that more discreet packages
>> would be better.
>>
>> Just to summerise what everyone has said I believe these packages is
>> what everyone is looking for:
>>
>> A single source package for the source release as well as the cpp
>> source package that removes the build dependency on ruby. The
> provided
>> binaries would be split in to broker, client, examples and tools.
> The
>> C++ binaries that we actually build could be limited to Windows, as
>> downstream packagers will provide other builds we can link to. Each
>> client language should have their own package and an additional
>> example/documentation package. Finally we will have a set of
> packages
>> for the management tools from all languages. Carl, you mentioned
> other
>> C++ tools but on the wiki I only see details about QMF and QMan if
> you
>> let me know what the other items that we should package are I'll pop
>> them on the list here:
>>
>> - Single Source package
>> - C++ Source package
>> - Binary Packages for
>>  + Brokers
>>    + C++
>>      - Windows only from Qpid, simply link to other downstream
> binary
>> builds for other platforms
>>    + Java
>>  + Client and Example Package
>>    + C++
>>      - Windows only from Qpid, simply link to other downstream
> binary
>> builds for other platforms
>>    + C# (0-8,0-10)
>>    + Java
>>    + Python
>>    + Ruby
>> + Management
>>   - Eclipse JMX Console
>>     + Win
>>     + Linux
>>     + OS X
>>  - JMX Command Line Tool
>>  - QMan / WsDmAdapter
>>
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> Martin
>>
>> 2009/2/19 Steve Huston <[email protected]>:
>> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> From: Rajith Attapattu [mailto:[email protected]]
>> >> ...
>> >> Binary distributions
>> >> ------------------------------------
>> >> +1 on having separate builds for brokers, clients and management
>> > tools
>> >> when ever it makes sense.
>> >> I have been advocating this for a while now.
>> >>
>> >> How ever as Aidan points out, for c++ its best we restrict our
>> > selves
>> >> to providing binaries for windows only.
>> >
>> > I have funding to produce Windows installer in the M5 (or whatever
>> > it's called) timeframe. The contents and shape of that are
>> not yet in
>> > place, so I'm open to hearing what people think it should contain.
>> > I've been working under the assumption that it will have:
>> >
>> > - broker binary
>> > - built DLLs (broker, client, common)
>> > - qmfconsole
>> > - sources (complete, and those required for building apps)
>> > - doxygen-generated docs
>> >
>> > -Steve
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
>> > Project:      http://qpid.apache.org
>> > Use/Interact: mailto:[email protected]
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Martin Ritchie
>>
>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
>> Project:      http://qpid.apache.org
>> Use/Interact: mailto:[email protected]
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
> Project:      http://qpid.apache.org
> Use/Interact: mailto:[email protected]
>
>



-- 
Martin Ritchie

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
Project:      http://qpid.apache.org
Use/Interact: mailto:[email protected]

Reply via email to