Hi James! On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 03:00:12PM +0000, James Mansion wrote: > I don't have older boost versions installed - is this a boost change?
Yes, IMHO it is a boost change. I am including a patch that helps me to make it compile and run. Best regards, Jasan -- Red Hat Czech, MRG Quality Assurance Associate """ Looking to carve out IT costs? www.europe.redhat.com/promo/carveoutcosts/ """
>From 10f37eddc6158dd5f726e93f19e7fa946091b7f4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jan Sarenik <[email protected]> Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 15:30:23 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Boost test API exception API has changed, this patch handles it for newer versions of Boost. --- cpp/src/tests/unit_test.h | 9 ++++++++- 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/cpp/src/tests/unit_test.h b/cpp/src/tests/unit_test.h index df3ebfb..fc542e6 100644 --- a/cpp/src/tests/unit_test.h +++ b/cpp/src/tests/unit_test.h @@ -61,7 +61,14 @@ namespace { struct test_name { void test_method(); }; } \ void test_name::test_method() -#endif // Workaround for BOOST_AUTO_TEST_SUITE_EXPECTED_FAILURES +#endif // Workaround for BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE_EXPECTED_FAILURES + +// Correct syntax for boost > 1.36 +#if (BOOST_VERSION > 103500) +# define QPID_AUTO_TEST_CASE_EXPECTED_FAILURES(name,n) \ + BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE_EXPECTED_FAILURES(name,n) \ + BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(name) +#endif // Correct syntax for boost > 1.36 // // Default definitions for latest version of boost. -- 1.6.0.1.196.g01914
--------------------------------------------------------------------- Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation Project: http://qpid.apache.org Use/Interact: mailto:[email protected]
