On Wed, 2009-04-15 at 15:37 +0100, Gordon Sim wrote: > I don't see view this work as replacing the existing API. I think it is > simply at a higher level of abstraction. >
I see a role for a 'mid-level' API that provides full access to what the protocol can do, without being tied to the protocol details. > The 0-10 specific API will still be supported and can I think be > considered stable. The initial implementation of the higher level API I > sketched out uses the 0-10 specific API that we have almost without change. > So are you thinking we'll implement the 0-10 API over the 1.0 protocol? I'd rather we get a more "neutral" API that's close enough to cover everything the protocol can do, but not tied to individual protocol commands. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation Project: http://qpid.apache.org Use/Interact: mailto:dev-subscr...@qpid.apache.org
