[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1880?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12715332#action_12715332
]
Bryan Kearney commented on QPID-1880:
-------------------------------------
What would you suggest? The code is not checked in yet, so we can make changes
as necessary. Keep in mind that a method call can return either a managed
object or struct, so at the very least I think they are in the same hierarchy.
-- bk
> The new unmanaged objects are confusing
> ---------------------------------------
>
> Key: QPID-1880
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-1880
> Project: Qpid
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Qpid Managment Framework
> Reporter: Ian Main
>
> IMO the newly added managed objects are confusing in that they return and
> look just like the managed objects, but you are unable to call methods on
> them, nor use eg the refresh() method to get a newly updated instance.
> QMF up until this point has made all objects managed and backed by an
> implementation. The addition of a data structure type could be very useful
> but I don't think it should share the same name as the managed objects around
> which QMF revolves.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation
Project: http://qpid.apache.org
Use/Interact: mailto:dev-subscr...@qpid.apache.org
