2009/11/7 Robert Godfrey <rob.j.godf...@gmail.com>: > It would seem to me that it would be better for this use-case to instead > implement something more analogous to time-to-live... only rather than that > signaling the time at which the message would be archived it would signal > the time at which the message becomes available for consumption. I'm not > too keen on Exchanges that hold on to messages...
Yes, I agree. How would you handle persistent messages if you hold them at the exchange? RG --------------------------------------------------------------------- Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation Project: http://qpid.apache.org Use/Interact: mailto:dev-subscr...@qpid.apache.org
