2009/11/26 Rajith Attapattu <rajit...@gmail.com> > On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 6:03 AM, Marnie McCormack > <marnie.mccorm...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > Hi Rajith & Rafi, > > > > I should be able to shed some light on the migration implications of this > > change. > > > > To check that I've understood what you're proposing - so the existing > > BindingURL implementation would be used for the 0-8/0-9 codepaths and > you're > > only writing an impl for the 0-10 path ? > > > > Regards, > > Marnie > > Marnie, > > Actually I am hoping to have support for both formats in the 0-10 > client (via a jvm switch) as I am sure there are several folks using > 0-10 in production. > For time being I only envisioned having the new format for 0-10 and > above, as I am not sure that 0-8/0-9 client will necessarily benefit > from the new format. > Is this fine with you? > > A JVM switch seems a fairly unfriendly way of letting the user do this... is there no way the code could dynamically detect which sort of URL format is in use?
-- Rob
