On Thu, 2009-12-03 at 09:09 +0000, Martin Ritchie wrote: > 2009/12/3 Carl Trieloff <cctriel...@redhat.com>: > > Andrew Stitcher wrote: > >> > >> As we are now locking the tree down for release I propose that all trunk > >> checkins should have a valid Jira number attached. > >> > >> Additionally, at this point I'd recommend that people think twice about > >> all checkins and only make checkins that are low risk or fix > >> blocker/critical bugs for the 0.6 release. > >> > >> If the release process becomes protracted for some reason we can > >> reconsider this. > >> > >> Do I need to request a formal vote? > > > > no vote needed, you are the release manager :-)
I think the authority there is really about what goes in the release, not about what is checked, so I have full authority to branch and revert stuff I think shouldn't be in the release before releasing. However I believe that our running of the repository is more cooperative. > > > > Carl. > > That said a little notice would have been nice. Well consider this a polite request, with a 2 week warning that I'll get serious at that point assuming the release seems stable (or if it gets destabilised by checkins in the meantime). > > I have some review changes for logging (1992,2001) that I'll be > commiting shortly, JIRA based, I've tagged them fix for 0.6. At this point I'm requesting circumspection in checkins combined with Jiras for every checkin - so excercise best judgement. Andrew --------------------------------------------------------------------- Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation Project: http://qpid.apache.org Use/Interact: mailto:dev-subscr...@qpid.apache.org
